The Instigator
DeAsante
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Krazzy_Player
Con (against)
Winning
25 Points

MESSI is the king of Barcelona not RONALDINHO.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Krazzy_Player
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/8/2014 Category: Sports
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 984 times Debate No: 48664
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)

 

DeAsante

Pro

Messi is best than Ronaldinho because dinho style of playing differ a little from that of Lionel and on the part of Messi Excellent dribbling,always on target thats what a player is to be.
Krazzy_Player

Con

I accept. State your case.
Debate Round No. 1
DeAsante

Pro

you accept he is the best right,the king of Barcelona
Krazzy_Player

Con

Round 1 is usually for acceptance.

Here's my case.


1. Ronaldinho played for FC Barcelona from 2003 to 2008.[1]

2
. Ronaldinho scored 110 goals in 250 appearances and he was the key player in Barcelona’s Champions League conquest, as well as two Liga titles and two Spanish Super Cups.[2]

3.
Ronaldinho won his first league title in 2004–05, and was named FIFA World player of the year for 2004 & 2005. This award is won by Ronaldinho 2 times whereas Lionel Messi has only won once. [3]

4.
Ronaldinho led Barcelona which progressed to the Champions league final, which they won on 17 May 2006 with a 2–1 defeat of Arsenal. [3]

5.
Ronaldinho led Barcelona to victory in 2006-07 Spanish Supercup, 2005-06 Champions League,
2005-06 League, 2005-06 Spanish Supercup, 2004-05 League. [1]


6.Ronaldinho had opponents who magnified his peak even more – he was up against Zidane, Figo. Messi has much more help at Barcelona.[4]

Sources


[1] http://arxiu.fcbarcelona.cat...
[2] http://www.fcbarcelona.com...
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org...
[4] http://www.fifa.com...

Debate Round No. 2
DeAsante

Pro

DeAsante forfeited this round.
Krazzy_Player

Con

My opponent failed to respond, therefore my arguments stand.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by PiercedPanda 2 years ago
PiercedPanda
DeAsanteKrazzy_PlayerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con explained why Rinaldinho is an important player, and accomplished quite a lot in his career. Pro stated a biased opinion backed up by no proof, followed by a forfeit. Con has sources, and pro doesn't, giving him points for reliable sources. Con wins hands down.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
DeAsanteKrazzy_PlayerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro never made an argument, whilst Con certainly did the opposite.
Vote Placed by Actionsspeak 2 years ago
Actionsspeak
DeAsanteKrazzy_PlayerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: FF and Con has sources.
Vote Placed by iamanatheistandthisiswhy 2 years ago
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
DeAsanteKrazzy_PlayerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: No sources so points to Con. No arguments so points to Con. Forfeit so points to Con. S&G to Con as Pro made mistakes. Interestingly enough I think Messi is equal to if not better than Ronaldhino. But results talk.