The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

MMA is better than Teekwandoo

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/23/2015 Category: Sports
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 470 times Debate No: 70536
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)




1-MMA has grabs and submission technique.
2-MMA fighters have faster , less predictable techniques.
3-MMA fighters have more developed bodies, as they have to train not only their legs but arms, back, hip, shoulders and more


The statement itself is an example of "errors of comparison" fallacy as these things are like apples and oranges.

Tai Kwan Do is about self defense and more importantly it is about discipline. Even in Tai Kwon Do competitions, the sparring that is done involves only light contact where points are awarded for a light hit and the force of these hits are strictly regulated. Outside of sparring events, students are taught to respect all others and only use what they have learned to defend themselves and only as much as is absolutely necessary.

MMA is purely fighting for sport and inflicting as much damage on another person as possible.

Yours was a very vague statement. these two disciplines are very different in philosophy and practice. To the point that saying one is "better" than the other is highly erroneous.
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by connorjfield 2 years ago
Better is a very vague term. try to be more specific for example stating it is more entertaining to watch or that MMA makes one a better pure fighter etc.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Lee001 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro should have made a a stronger argument if he only chose to do one round. Con wins with overall argument.