Making Beauty Pageants Illegal
Debate Rounds (4)
Beauty pageants lead a path to college that the girl originally would not be subject to. While offering a way to help confidence and self worth, beauty pageants can lead to scholarships a girl might of never had the chance to get.
This is the basic, simple plot of the arguments that could take place. My opponents argument will have a brief open statement as well. Thank you.
paigeb forfeited this round.
I am negating the reasons to prohibit beauty pageants for 3 key reasons. Participating in beauty pageants is a right of a parent to decide, and at a young age can give contestants recognition that may lead to future scholarships a contestant may of otherwise not been able to receive. Beauty pageants receive a negative reputation because of the media.
First of all, a parent has the right to parent their kid as long as it is not endangering the child. The federal government has no right to tell parents how to parent their children. This falls under the right to privacy. As long as there is no child endangerment, then this cannot be banned on the basic principles of liberty. A ban would not succeed. Hilary Levey Freedman, a research associate at Harvard Kennedy school, states, "Historically and legally, our system defers to parents to make the right decision for their child. We see the family as a more private entity." Parents make decisions for their children everyday, from what school they attend to what activities they do. From a bad reputation, beauty pageants have been scrutinized, when they are no different from other activities like dance. Beauty pageants are beneficial, leading to scholarships and recognition.  This gets contestants prepared for future achievements.
Second, beauty pageants can give contestants recognition and scholarships that may have not been available before, Banning beauty pageants in the early stages will not be beneficial for these children, nor prepare them. There are many opportunities for children that participate in pageants. Despite what my opponent thinks, that it is all about what is on the surface, is in fact, false. In fact, there are a variety of factors that contribute to what beauty pageants are judged for and who gets scholarships.  It is really promoting education, specifically to girls.
In addition, beauty pageants are misinterpreted by the public. Producer, Mike Fleiss, states 20- 80 percent of all reality shows are edited to show negativity.  Beauty pageants get negative feedback because of the manipulation of media and popular television shows, like the well known 'Toddlers and Tiaras'. He states that these shows are edited in an hour with all negative scenes possible, some even staged. Shows and the media are really misinforming people of what really occurs.
Beauty pageants are beneficial and show be available for any parent to decide if their child is fit to compete or not.
These pageants sexulise young girls. They promote sexual stereotypes which transform girls in to sexual objects. Have you noticed the growing number of young girls wearing extreme amounts of makeup and heavily padded bras. This is because society (pageants) have given the impression that this is how girls should look.
A 2007 report by the American Psychological Association found that the hypersexualization of young girls is strongly connected with eating disorders, low self-esteem, and depression. It also leads to fewer girls pursuing careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.http://edition.cnn.com...
Scholarships should not be awarded because somebody is pretty it should be given because they are hard working. Beauty is natural, you are born with it so why should you get an expensive scholarship because of it. What about the less pretty girls they are given the impression they are worthless and they don't get the opportunity to enter a contest based simply on beauty and sexual appeal.
Beauty pageant give an impression to young girls that beauty is much more important than it actually is. Life is not about looks.
I have to disagree. Parents make up countless decisions of their child's life. Dance and cheer leading are very similar to beauty pageants, as dance is a part of beauty pageants. However, dance and cheer leading are not covered by the media. Thus, the media is to blame for the growing controversy over beauty pageants.
Secondly, I do agree the show Toddlers and Tiaras does show does sexualize young girls. However, again, we have to remember my media argument in the previous round. We can not let a small group of children and parents ruin the experience for everyone else. For example, in a talent show, there might be a poor act. That does not ruin the entire show, though. The same is for beauty pageants. In fact, everything in the word. There are people who do poor things, and people who dress their children poorly, but we can not prohibit pageants for everyone. I do not believe that beauty pageants are actually sexualizing girls for adults to judge, and that should be the reason why we prohibit them. Cheer leading has judges. Dance has judges. They put on a show.
Thirdly, I disagree that scholarships are given just on looks. Beauty pageants have been transformed into a sport that judges more than external beauty. They judge talent and even ask the girls questions that they must answer properly. The truth is the world does revolve around looks. As much as we want this to be a under the surface world, what is on the surface is also a thriving business as well. Being a model is a job.
You said that less girls are pursuing careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. You implied this was a bad thing. However, that is a complete personal opinion on the basis of those fields are more important. It is also your opinion that less pretty girls feel worthless. We need to take in consideration if beauty pageants are causing this, or other factors like magazines or television shows, and not necessarily beauty pageants. My opponent is making the assumption that beauty pageants are the underlying cause of eating disorders, which is not true. In fact, without a statistic that it is only from beauty pageants, I can only disregard that argument, which anyway, would be impossibly of getting without other factors. The argument my opponent presented was correlating with beauty pageants, but in no way causation.
In conclusion, beauty pageants can not be blamed on the focus of the media who only reports the worse stories. In fact, one of the only statistics my opponent presented were from a reality TV show, 'Toddlers and Tiaras'. Taking this into great consideration, we need to also look at the reasoning. Modeling is a job. Beauty pageants support scholarships, something a child might of not had the opportunity to get otherwise. My opponent is assuming that without beauty pageants, kids would get more educated and work harder in schools, which is an assumption and not true.
wildpuffin forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by kbub 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Oof, an inopportune forfeit for Pro. It's hard in the last one, because you can't really make it up. Con of course also had a forfeit, but she was able to recover somewhat in the later rounds. Pro, I actually quite agree with your case; however, your arguments were not thoroughly defended. Con was right in saying that you did not demonstrate that the problems you listed were certainly due to pageants. You also did not demonstrate that beauty pagents are primarily about looks (mainly because you forfeited your last round I think). Pro did win that some pagents are sexist, but like Con said many things in our society are sexist. Pro did not show that it is sexist enough to make it illegal. The thing about children's permission was interesting and I think would have made a good argument, but it wasn't well developed; Con mentioned (though Con I think you might have refuted more thoroughly) that parents do have the right to make certain decisions for their children. I vote Con. Thanks!
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.