Male Homosexuality is unnatural
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
Fusionized
| Started: | 2/6/2012 | Category: | Health |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 680 times | Debate No: | 20897 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (6)
 Pro  Con I will offer the definition of "natural" as, "Existing in or formed by nature (opposed to artificial)1." My first point demonstrating that male homosexuality is natural will be based upon the observation of homosexual behaviour in nature. Homosexuality has been observed in "more than 1,500 animal species" belonging to various groups of the Animal Kingdom2. Thus, male homosexuality does in fact exist in nature outside of the influence of human society. *Citations in Comments section. |
 |
|
Pro Con None of my opponent's claims have anything to do with the resolution, nor are they substantiated. We are not talking about "human nature." The resolution clearly states that this debate is over whether or not "male homosexuality is unnatural." |
 |
|
Pro Con Thank you for the debate. With my opponent's concession, as well as the fact that my evidenced claim of homosexuality being prevalent throughout nature went unchallenged, I will conclude with no further arguments. |
 |
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by Ricky_Zahnd 1 year ago
| politicalguy34 | Fusionized | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - |  | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: indeed
Vote Placed by wiploc 1 year ago
| politicalguy34 | Fusionized | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Favorite quote: "the female vagina witch." I can't think which story she belongs in, but S&G to Con.
Pro had the burden of proof, but never attempted to prove anything.
Vote Placed by Volkov 1 year ago
| politicalguy34 | Fusionized | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pretty effin' obvious why.
Vote Placed by vmpire321 1 year ago
| politicalguy34 | Fusionized | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: CON made arguments that made much more sense..
and "well played" seemd like a concession to me.
Vote Placed by imabench 1 year ago
| politicalguy34 | Fusionized | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: "Homosexuals are to blame for variuose diseases such as AIDS" <- the point where i decided to award all 7 points to the con....
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 1 year ago
| politicalguy34 | Fusionized | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not make arguments supporting the resolution. He gave unsupported opinions.
http://www.nhm.uio.no...
http://dictionary.reference.com...
[2]. University of Oslo: Natural History Museum. (2009, November 18). Homosexuality in the animal kingdom. Retrieved from
http://www.nhm.uio.no...
Note for those reading/voting on this debate: There is a limit of 500 characters for each response, explaining their brevity.