Man should be locked up for at least ten years or bond should be at least one million
Debate Rounds (2)
He commited a murder. Beat a life to death. Someone please tell me im not the only one that thinks he deserves a higher sentence or higher bond.
I accept. Arguments will be in the next round.
Secondly, What if when he comes out he is tempted to do it again, i mean his punishment wasnt so great. he can decide to escalate to taking human lives.
Basiclly, I am just worried for the safety of my animals and even other human lives.
Please vote pro.
I disagree. If you kill a pet, most times, you go to jail for one year or just pay money to harm animals. This means that we can't hunt anything and not hunt or eat meat because if you kill a pet you go in jail for 1 million years. Also no one lives until 1 million and they will probably rot.
For these reasons vote for me!!!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Balacafa 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||5||1|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro used sources and incorporated them into their argument. Con failed to use any sources therefore sources go to Pro. Pro also made a valid argument about dogs being alive. Con failed to refute this argument, therefore Pro met there BoP can con loses arguments. Pro failed to capitalize I in I'm and there were no notible spelling mistakes in Con's argument. This means that Con receives the S&G point.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.