The Instigator
LADYBUG36
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points
The Contender
debate-master1
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

Man should be locked up for at least ten years or bond should be at least one million

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
LADYBUG36
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/24/2015 Category: News
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 527 times Debate No: 80114
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (6)
Votes (1)

 

LADYBUG36

Pro

http://www.theindychannel.com...
He commited a murder. Beat a life to death. Someone please tell me im not the only one that thinks he deserves a higher sentence or higher bond.
debate-master1

Con

I accept. Arguments will be in the next round.
Debate Round No. 1
LADYBUG36

Pro

First of all, the minimun sentence for taking a life ( muder) is 25 or 60 years. Is a dog not alive? In other words, is it not a life. This man , Jacob Rodgers, has taken this puppys' life for a simple incedent, wetting his bed, and all he got was a 5 thousand dollor bond, or if convicted a 30 month sentence. I find this quite unsettling. Im not saying he should serve all 25 years cause i know that will never happen, but to bring this dog justice i say at least 10 years or a higher bond.
Secondly, What if when he comes out he is tempted to do it again, i mean his punishment wasnt so great. he can decide to escalate to taking human lives.
Basiclly, I am just worried for the safety of my animals and even other human lives.
http://www.statisticbrain.com...
Please vote pro.
debate-master1

Con

I disagree. If you kill a pet, most times, you go to jail for one year or just pay money to harm animals. This means that we can't hunt anything and not hunt or eat meat because if you kill a pet you go in jail for 1 million years. Also no one lives until 1 million and they will probably rot.

For these reasons vote for me!!!
Debate Round No. 2
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by LADYBUG36 2 years ago
LADYBUG36
:p
Posted by Lee001 2 years ago
Lee001
LOL..
*sigh*
I <3 you lexus.
Posted by Lexus 2 years ago
Lexus
LOL WHAT how can you exist and not know what bond is, but know a kritik?
Posted by lol101 2 years ago
lol101
Nvm. I didn't know what bond meant.
Posted by lol101 2 years ago
lol101
I would run a kritik, but I want you to have a chance. Hopefully nobody too challenging accepts.
Posted by lol101 2 years ago
lol101
One million years in prison?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Balacafa 2 years ago
Balacafa
LADYBUG36debate-master1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:51 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro used sources and incorporated them into their argument. Con failed to use any sources therefore sources go to Pro. Pro also made a valid argument about dogs being alive. Con failed to refute this argument, therefore Pro met there BoP can con loses arguments. Pro failed to capitalize I in I'm and there were no notible spelling mistakes in Con's argument. This means that Con receives the S&G point.