The Instigator
RainbowDash52
Pro (for)
Winning
8 Points
The Contender
Surrealism
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Math challenge

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
RainbowDash52
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/19/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 636 times Debate No: 56876
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (2)

 

RainbowDash52

Pro

The first round is for acceptance.

The second round I will post a positive whole number.

The challenge: Post 2 positive whole numbers that when multiplied together equal the number I posted in the second round. Neither of those numbers can be the number 1.

The first to complete the challenge wins. I can't complete the challenge the same round I post the number so my opponent gets the first chance to complete the challenge. If nobody is able to complete the challenge, my opponent wins.
Surrealism

Con

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
RainbowDash52

Pro

number: 2411667898559004051960186229162734322671742088617359089845931334671
Surrealism

Con

First number: 8.3125544e+46
Second number: 29012356192035162350
Debate Round No. 2
RainbowDash52

Pro

My opponent's numbers don't meet the challenge. You can use this http://web2.0calc.com... to check if his two numbers work, which they don't.

These numbers do complete the challenge:
937748634966726163746318950483273,
2571763699388990842068052197183127

Again you can use this http://web2.0calc.com... to verify my numbers do work. Just copy past the 2 numbers in with * in between and press the equals button on the calculator. You will see the result is the number I posted for the challenge.

I am the first to complete the challenge. Vote for me.
Surrealism

Con

Yes, I essentially have no justification here, so I can't really ask you to vote for me except out of a sense of dadaism.
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Surrealism 3 years ago
Surrealism
Yes indeed you are correct. Actually, this calculator is very nice and I wish I had known about it before. Anyway, good challenge.
Posted by RainbowDash52 3 years ago
RainbowDash52
Yes I got the prime numbers first and multiplied them together. That is really the only known way to answer this type of question in a reasonable amount of time.
Posted by LaughingRiddle 3 years ago
LaughingRiddle
As for why Con might have got it wrong. Most online and scientific calculators lose accuracy at such large number values and should not be relied on. I book marked Pros suggest calculator for this reason.
Posted by LaughingRiddle 3 years ago
LaughingRiddle
i"m curious; did PRO know the numbers before hand?

Designing a number made by two large prime numbers is more difficult than simply looking up two extremely large primes and multiplying them together.
Posted by LaughingRiddle 3 years ago
LaughingRiddle
No standard base divisibility here. Arduous, But intriguing Prime numbers problem.
Posted by LaughingRiddle 3 years ago
LaughingRiddle
I think Cons answer must be incorrect.... his numbers both end in 0.
Posted by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
interesting debate...
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 3 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
RainbowDash52SurrealismTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by tylergraham95 3 years ago
tylergraham95
RainbowDash52SurrealismTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: The Pro met the challenge.