Mathematics should be optional in post-secondary education.
Debate Rounds (3)
Why should a nursing student take photography or a history major take trigonometry?
They shouldn't. If you already know what you want to do with your life, you should invest your time and studies in that field. I propose we allow mathematics and other subjects we learned in grade school to stay in college but only as core-classes.
College is place in which people can further their own pursuit of knowledge; however, that should not be limited to their major of choice. The general education courses in college, as well as major-related courses, serve to give a person a new perspective on the world around them, not just to reiterate previously learned knowledge. A person's point of view depends upon the knowledge they have accumulated over their life. For example, a person skilled in mathematics views things differently than a person skilled in physics or psychology. Therefore, getting a more rounded knowledge allows a person to look at things from more than just one point of view.
That is, in a general sense, my main stance in this argument; however, I will touch upon other points in the main argument of round 2. That being said, I would like to make it clear that neither Pro nor I are limited to the points made in this brief summary round when presenting our arguments in round 2.
I look forward to the rest of the debate.
NeoVoltaire forfeited this round.
If it could be taught in college it shouldn't be a requirement for those who aren't heavily focused for mathematics as a career or major. It simply is there for students who didn't fully "graduate" from the grade school mathematics to to stay in an undergraduate status longer.
1. Liberal Arts - "college or university studies (as language, philosophy, literature, abstract science) intended to provide chiefly general knowledge and to develop general intellectual capacities (as reason and judgment) as opposed to professional or vocational skills" .
1. Instead of arguing simply for a requirement to take mathematics in college, I will argue for the requirements to take core subjects in general, which is typical in liberal arts colleges.
Now for my argument:
Liberal Arts Education Better Prepares Graduates for Work
According to a study done by Hardwick Day, consultant for the Annapolis Group, "seventy-six percent of liberal arts college graduates rated their college experience highly for preparing them for their first job, compared to 66 percent who attended public flagship universities" . While the graduates in this study did not specify what about their college experience prepared them for their first job, the fact that graduates in liberal arts education felt more prepared is worth noting. Students may not specifically use the knowledge acquired in these general courses in their job; however, these courses can provide the ability to view things from different perspectives, which can be useful in their careers.
The Courses Are Not a Waste of Time
Being a Pre-med major in a College Algebra or Social Science class may seem like a waste of time; however, those credits ultimately go towards that student's total credit hours needed to graduate, which is usually higher than the required credits for the major. In order to illustrate, I will use an example based on my college. I am currently attending a four-year college and am majoring in accounting. My major requires that I get 64 credits , but in order to graduate from my college, I need a total of 128 credits , which is double the amount needed for my major. Those extra credits can be met by adding a minor or another major, but my general education requirements also assist in reaching that goal; therefore, no time is wasted on taking those courses.
Not all Course Requirements in a Major are Directly About It
For this part, I will refer back to the requirements of my major . My accounting major not only requires that I take courses on accounting, but that I also take courses related to marketing, business administration, financing, etc. Con argues that "If you already know what you want to do with your life, you should invest your time and studies in that field." Using that logic, why should I have to take classes about marketing? I want to be an accountant, so should all my classes be specifically about accounting? If I did that, I would be very specialized in accounting, but that would be all I really know how to do in the world of business. Focusing on one specific field of study only serves to narrow the mind to a single point of view, which could potentially inhibit a person's potential to grow in the future.
Very Few Graduates Find Jobs in Their Major
According to some data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, only 27% of college students work in a job that requires their college major  (this only includes those with undergraduate degrees). If it is really that difficult to get a job in a student's major of choice, then is it really wise to only focus on that major? If people did that, what could happen when they are unable to find a job within that major? It is possible that they would be less desirable compared to those that have a wider variety of knowledge; therefore, I would argue that it is more beneficial to be well-rounded on top of a specialization, in order to expand the career opportunities.
Students Tend to Change Their Majors
It is not uncommon for college students to switch majors during their study. In fact, "research by Penn State and other institutions has shown that . . . up to 50 percent of college students change their majors at least once before graduation, and some change several times" . This is important to note as it shows that even when people are sure of what they want to do with their life, their minds can still be changed. Taking a wide variety of courses can assist a person in finding their true passion.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Mysterious_Stranger 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: FF on pro's side.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.