The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
0 Points

Matt Smith was a good Doctor Who!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/3/2016 Category: TV
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 461 times Debate No: 85991
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




Matt Smith was young and not experienced enough to play the Doctor. As he succeeded David Tennant, he had some large boots to fill and failed spectacularly.


Matt Smith was a good Doctor and played the role admirably. David Tennant may have been a better Doctor however he had the advantage of a better story lines as Russel T Davies was a much better writer for Doctor Who that Steven Moffat was. Because of this Matt Smith was seen as an underrated Doctor and is berated by people for it. It is unfair and unjust to view him as a bad Doctor as you always need to take into account the skill of the writer. He also gets grilled more than he should as David Tennant, who player the best Doctor due to his magnificent reprisal of the show, was the Doctor before him so Smith had to live up to the high standard that had been left behind in Tennant's wake.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.