Meaning of Life Is Subjective
Debate Rounds (3)
By accepting this debate, my opponent disagrees with the motion that the meaning/purpose of human life is subjective. They must prove that the meaning of life is not subjective (alternatively that it is objective). Remember that if you use a religion to give your life meaning, then this is subjective as different religions give different meanings of life and people not following one particular religion will hold different view to the meaning of life.
It is evident in the world that the meaning of life is subjective. I have asked many different people this question. some muslims said the meaning of life is to worship Allah and pass this worldly test. Other people said you just live happily and achieve your goals. Some said to marry and have children. No matter what the meaning/purpose of our lives is that you believe in, there will always be other people who don't share your meaning of life. Hence this proves that the meaning of life is subjective to people and not an ultimate, universal and objective truth.
Another way of interpreting this motion is by asking why are we here? Is there a reason, which demands humanity to conform to? If not, then does that mean the meaning of life, belief of why we are here and exist, are subjective to each person?
What you call "the meaning of life" is actually your projection of meaning upon your perception of life. Whatever meaning exists, it is not "-of life" but "-of your conscious experience". The meaning is not inherent to life but of your own conscious perspective, epistemologically downstream of your 5 senses. There are plenty of life forms without central nervous systems with which to draw abstract thoughts and, so, the question of meaning is necessarily separate from the issue of whether life is present in a particular scenario.
Furthermore, independent of your perception of it, life continues to exist and have the properties that it does. Whatever properties life does possess they are objective ones and they do not include meaning. The meaning of life, objectively, does not exist and is, therefore, not subjective.
You have raised some very intriguing points.
I understand what you mean by arguing that properties of life are objective and that life objectively exists independent of our perception of its meaning. Nevertheless, most humans in the world (take the examples of the majorities from Christianity and Islam) disagree with your view. Muslims and Christians (as well as other theists) believe that God gave humans life and created everything. Muslims believe the meaning of life is to worship God and christians may agree and add that the meaning of life is also to find peace in God and follow Jesus' teachings to attain heaven. Hence, christians and muslims would argue that from their beliefs the meaning of life does exist (from God) and our lives would not exist if God didn't create us, so the meaning is objective in the sense that it is only to please God and other subjective views are wrong. I am not using the fact that the majority of the world's population hold these beliefs for the meaning of life, to prove that their beliefs are right. However, this example supports my stance on this debate and proves the motion right, that the meaning of life is subjective.
Your opinion that the objective meaning of life does not exist is also subjective and my argument by example above illustrates how a subjective view can be taken of our lives, which disregards your argument of life existing independently of our perception of its meaning.
"What you call "the meaning of life" is actually your projection of meaning upon your perception of life. Whatever meaning exists, it is not "-of life" but "-of your conscious experience".
If the meaning of life is my projection of meaning upon my perception of life- then this supports the motion that the meaning of life is subjective. My consciousness and my physical body together make up my life as it is now- a typical human life. Therefore this meaning, if it exists, is of the whole of life (including the physical bodily aspect of life), not only a fraction of it, the conscious aspect.
The question of meaning is not separate from the issue of whether life/existence is present. That is like saying that the meaning/purpose of a car (which is to drive) is independent of a car existing. The car could not have a meaning/purpose if it did not exist, just like human life can't have (even objective) meaning without existing. Asking what is the meaning/purpose of something that does not have life/existence is irrational. Hence arguing that the meaning of humans' lives is independent of there being life, is irrational.
Not all people who have an opinion on the meaning of life can prove it. They may use a holy scripture, inside feeling, satisfaction of desires or achievement of goals to support their view of the meaning of life, but this isn't necessarily strong evidence. It is easy for me to prove that the meaning of life is subjective, just ask people from different cultures, backgrounds and religions: 'What is the meaning of life?' And you will be able to see with this experiment that the meaning is subjective to different people. In other words, you choose what the meaning in your life is.
Centuries ago, everybody knew that the world was flat... and they were wrong.
//"The question of meaning is not separate from the issue of whether life/existence is present."//
At one point in time, the only lifeforms were single celled organisms, they had no central nervous systems and, so, no conscious experience. There is no "what it is like to be" an amoeba . "Meaning" is inseparable from "conscious experience", yes, but life does not necessarily denote conscious experience.
//"The car could not have a meaning/purpose if it did not exist"//
A car does not have a purpose, conscious observers have a purpose FOR the car. The meaning/purpose does not really exist.
Current neuroscience is indicating that free-will does not exist. If this is true then meaning, which derives from this "sense of self", does not exist either.
I agree we give subjective meaning to our lives only through our consciousness and that life doesn't necessarily denote conscious experience. Therefore it is good I specified in round one that: "By accepting this debate, my opponent disagrees with the motion that the meaning/purpose of human life is subjective." I am specifically debating for human life (which has conscious experience) as having a subjective meaning, not a single celled organism with no consciousness to create meaning.
This 'meaning' obviously doesn't exist physically in the world, but rather is a purpose created by the human mind through our consciousness. So in this way meaning does exist, it's just that it is 'not out there' but inside our minds, because the meaning was created or was initiated through our consciousness. Hence if someone argues the meaning of life is to achieve your dreams, then this meaning subjectively does exist, in the sense that it makes the life of that person purposeful and (some may argue) worth living. It is a meaning they regard to be true for themself personally. Just because this particular example of the meaning of life doesn't objectively exist in nature, does not mean it doesn't exist subjectively through that person's consciousness, just like thoughts form through our consciousness and therefore exist, but not in the physical form 'out there'.
I encourage everyone to vote for the motion, because if you feel you have a meaning, purpose or goal in life and you feel it is real and true for you, then you believe there is a meaning of life. All you now need to do to understand how this meaning of life is subjective, is to look around you and ask different people what they think the meaning of life is. Everyone will not say their meaning of life is the same as yours. This proves the meaning of life is subjective (down to individual's opinion/feeling and interpretation), rather than not existing at all. You probably won't find many people believing 'meaning of life doesn't exist', but this is also their subjective view on the meaning of life.
Thank you Z4RQUON for the debate which has changed one of my perspectives on life.
Z4RQUON forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.