Men are smarter than women
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 9 votes the winner is...
mizkhan
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 12/16/2013 | Category: | Education | ||
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 3,282 times | Debate No: | 42457 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (43)
Votes (9)
 Pro  Con For example, a 2008 Higher Education Policy Institute report said women are not only more likely to get into better schools, they"re also more likely to outperform the men once there. Then, in 2009, a British researcher named Adrian Furnham released a report which said men and women likely have the same levels of intelligence, but men are more apt to think they are smarter than women. Another story for the "Obvious" file. In 2010, some researchers created an online version of the popular board game "Trivial Pursuit" to study which sex has the better brain. Five months and more than 15 million questions later, the researchers said women answered more questions correctly than men. Today"s report says women, on average, score 5 points higher than men in IQ tests. According to James Flynn, an expert on IQ tests, this is the first time in over 100 years women have scored higher than men, and it"s likely due to all that multi-tasking women are so gosh-darned good at. "In the last 100 years the IQ scores of both men and women have risen but women"s have risen faster," said Flynn. |
 |
|
Pro Con see the present why are you seeing past according to Forbes magazine 2013 edition most powerful person in the world is German chancellor Angela merkel not the U.S.A president or some other country male person. women are smarter than men . and why are you supporting your argument with videos.. |
 |
|
Pro Con and bye the way .. this is last round and as you did not post any argument..i will also conclude bye just saying a thought: BEHIND EVERY SUCCESSFUL MAN THERE IS A HAND OF WOMEN.!!!1 |
 |
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
| hoer23 | mizkhan | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to con because of pro's sexism and arguments to Con because he had arguments rather than videos.
Vote Placed by pranmar123 3 years ago
| hoer23 | mizkhan | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: HE did better than PRO
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
| hoer23 | mizkhan | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 2 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments to con as he posted an actual written argument. Conduct to con because he didn't only post videos. Videos do count as sources though.
Vote Placed by imabench 3 years ago
| hoer23 | mizkhan | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: a handful of video's of feminists being 'destroyed' in a debate falls far short of the argument that men are smarter than women, and con actually presented some evidence that women are equal to, if not smarter, then men are, though con's arguments became spectacularly sh*tty in the later rounds. Arguments to con though since pro still fell tremendously short of fulfilling his BOP
Vote Placed by dtaylor971 3 years ago
| hoer23 | mizkhan | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: PRO had videos, which counts as sources for me. However, he failed to bake any written arguments. S&G goes to PRO because con forgot to capitalize a ton.
Vote Placed by Josh_b 3 years ago
| hoer23 | mizkhan | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 5 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: it was mostly tied but the story of feminism video really hooked me as a better argument and resource for Pro.
Vote Placed by noprisu 3 years ago
| hoer23 | mizkhan | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: This is just.... sad. If Pro wanted to debate using videos, she should specify in the comments her intent. The format for the debates should be the same across both contenders to have an equal platform to judge off of. This is just my opinion, however. Correct me (with written words) if i may be wrong on this. All points to Con for conduct and arguments and having something to judge for SnG.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
| hoer23 | mizkhan | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Some men are, however clearly not pro. CONDUCT: Hate content in most rounds, and refusing to post an argument even when prodded to. S&G: Con's use of all caps did make this comparable. ARGUMENTS: Pro failed to even attempt to make one. SOURCES: This would go to pro, if he had related his videos to his argument. Very tempted to award this to con, due to pro doing no more than source spamming... However bad sources from one side, does not automatically give it to the other (besides, to even grade this I'd have to at least skim those hour long spam videos).
Vote Placed by Gohan12345 3 years ago
| hoer23 | mizkhan | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had no argument and just gave videos and for the love of pete sake the conduct for him because he showed a complete argument and had better sources
Pro was a troll posting vids out of no where expecting to win and his account is closed thanks to all his reports.
They are both smart and the blame goes to pro because he brought the topic up
Both Pro and Con were wrong.
Men and women are EQUAL.
Any that a man can do can be done by a woman, and any thing that a woman can do can be done by a man (except childbirth).
I'm going to abstain from voting on this debate because both sides were so wrong.