The Instigator
KingDebater
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points
The Contender
rocithomas
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

Men shouldn't have the right to vote.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
rocithomas
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/19/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 669 times Debate No: 84049
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (2)

 

KingDebater

Pro

serious debaters only

r1- acceptance
r2- arguments
r3- rebuttals
Debate Round No. 1
KingDebater

Pro

KingDebater forfeited this round.
rocithomas

Con

The world is a free country if we stop rights the more rebels and wars we will have.
Debate Round No. 2
KingDebater

Pro

Traditionally, the man would vote on behalf of his family. However, society has now progressed by giving women the right to vote. Now is the time for it to take a step further by allowing the woman to take the responsibility for her husband, and take the right to vote away from men.

In Russia, there's a saying that the woman is the neck and body of the family, the man is the head. This references the fact that women are better than men at handling home affairs, such as finances and cleaning, whereas the men go out to work. But upon further inspection, the phrase is a pathetic attempt by the male chauvinist to save face, showing the irrationality behind masculinity and accepting the truth of female supremacy, but only to a degree.

This is the direction that society is headed, and now it's being accepted more widely and openly that women are superior. By four, young girls now notice they are more intelligent, better behaved, and try harder than boys. By age 8, the boys finally accept it as well. Into adulthood, women are more effective workers across the board, and are now, despite residual misogyny, outearning men.

On a fundamental step to inevitable and glorious matriarchy, we must continue recognizing women and give her full power over men. Women have higher IQs, are less bigoted, and have better social skills, so handing all voting rights to them is common sense. To progress further, we need a mature public, and letting the dumber, weaker, lazier sex - men - vote would be a grave mistake.

Girls are better students http://www.bbc.co.uk...
Women are better workers http://www.theglobeandmail.com...
These days, boys are getting physically weaker from staying inside too much, allowing girls to overtake them in upper body strength https://m.youtube.com...
rocithomas

Con

You want a argument, i'll give you one.

The topic of this argument is men shouldn't have the right to vote, not are men smarter then ladies. You are giving me proof and studies that women are 'smarter' then men, but nothing else. You are giving me no reason why we should stop rights of innocent, smart and strong people. Ever heard of Steven Hawking, Steve Jobs or Isaac Newton, all men, and all smartest people ever. Which gives proof that men are smart. But I said there didn't need proof for that. All we need is a free country.
Rules that are not dumb and rules that will keep the world going.
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by KingDebater 1 year ago
KingDebater
I'll debate you on it if you like
Posted by Richardsonalj 1 year ago
Richardsonalj
Why? We already had a gender unable to vote, why make it like that again. If this is in the United States we'd be throwing out natural rights and degrading a whole system, once again making it a sexist one, at that point we might as well make it extremely conservative and racist with asian and middle eastern slaves; it's that ridiculous!

"In Russia, there's a saying that the woman is the neck and body of the family, the man is the head. This references the fact that women are better than men at handling home affairs, such as finances and cleaning, whereas the men go out to work." quoting you, I can tell you this isn't 100% accurate everywhere, you are literally stereotyping both genders here, something that parents and teachers warn us from doing, but you're doing it! Why are you stereotyping?

You're claiming that all women are better than men, let's not make groups of people then ranking them, and all people aren't the same, they're individuals. There are some men who are better than some women, and some women are better than some men, that's a fact. Let's change that sentence to what is really more accurate, one person can be better than another, and that person can be worse than another person.

That's all I have to say.
Posted by KingDebater 1 year ago
KingDebater
No, it's not a joke, it's serious
Posted by Ayden_Linden 1 year ago
Ayden_Linden
This is a joke, correct?
Posted by AngryBlogger 1 year ago
AngryBlogger
I accept this challenge!
Posted by KingDebater 1 year ago
KingDebater
debate me, neckbeard
Posted by dolandislife 1 year ago
dolandislife
u r stupid. but ur good looking, baby girl. So I'll let it slide
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
KingDebaterrocithomasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF, so conduct to Con. Pro also had the BOP, which remained unfulfilled. None of their arguments [girls are better at ______], were actually enough to deny men the right to vote. Pro needs to understand that the rights to vote is guaranteed to all citizens regardless of personal ability. He never tried to go after this one fact. Con technically won the debate when he said we live in a free society, which guarantees everyone the right to vote, and this simple statement was ignored by Pro.
Vote Placed by kingkd 1 year ago
kingkd
KingDebaterrocithomasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:23 
Reasons for voting decision: "so handing all voting rights to them is common sense." No it is not, just because some people are smarter does not give them more rights. Con pointed this out with his examples. Sources to Pro because Pro had sources