The Instigator
kenziebaker
Con (against)
Losing
11 Points
The Contender
NarutoUzamaki
Pro (for)
Winning
17 Points

Men verses Women (who is better?)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
NarutoUzamaki
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/5/2014 Category: People
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 634 times Debate No: 45280
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (8)
Votes (6)

 

kenziebaker

Con

I think that girls are better than boys.
PHYSICS: Girls are better.
COOKING: Girls are better.
POLITICS: Girls are better.
Girls and boys aren't involved in verses teams because sometimes girls can get rough.
NarutoUzamaki

Pro

I would like to point out that this debate is only opinion and there is basically no factual evidence on girls being better than boys.
I will not refute my opponents statement because it is all opinion and he is making a judgment.
PHYSICS: Girls are better.

Can you explain those things with a source

COOKING: Girls are better

Please explain because some men can cook a gourmay dish.

POLITICS: Girls are better.

Please explain your point correctly



If girls are better than boys where is your proof? Unles you give me the burden of the proof that women are better than boys than I will believe right now this is all opinion.

This will be part of my argument which will be stated now.

Argument 1:

Men get paid more and they are paid on a daily basis and a dily salary while women get less than men,


Argument 2:

Men are more atheletic than girls in most of the sports you mainly see on TV

American football= Mainly men

Basketeball = men

Argument 3


Men are equal to women and they cant be compared basically both are great and you cannot say women are better than girls without factual evidence.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com...





Debate Round No. 1
kenziebaker

Con

First of all, I am not a male.
When you said this "Basketball = men"
Look on TV and you will see that there is Women's Basketball
Also, you spelled basketball wrong.
You see women playing football on TV also.
How do you know what the difference is in men and women's allowance?
Are you a boy and a girl?
Do you believe everything that the web says?
NarutoUzamaki

Pro

Refute
My opponent still states opinion but no source and men and women are equal. You cannot say who is better. Right now this is just silly. To conclude we are equal
Debate Round No. 2
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by NarutoUzamaki 3 years ago
NarutoUzamaki
@kbub I agree
Posted by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
This is silly.
Posted by ESocialBookworm 3 years ago
ESocialBookworm
If you are CON, whose side are you on?
Posted by Mikal 3 years ago
Mikal
The resolution is ____ is better. Which do you support
Posted by Mikal 3 years ago
Mikal
The resolution is ____ is better. Which do you support
Posted by Mikal 3 years ago
Mikal
The resolution is ____ is better. Which do you support
Posted by Complicated_Mind 3 years ago
Complicated_Mind
So... Do you think men or women are better? What do you side with? You say they are 'just as good' as each other so it is unclear who you side with.
Posted by ESocialBookworm 3 years ago
ESocialBookworm
I REALLY want to accept this debate but I know I won't have time to post.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by codemeister13 3 years ago
codemeister13
kenziebakerNarutoUzamakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:15 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro backed up arguments with some form of a source while Con made rather baseless assertions. Had they provided sources or factual evidence, this may have gone a different way. S&G go to Con due to spelling errors on Pro's part.
Vote Placed by emilydebate 3 years ago
emilydebate
kenziebakerNarutoUzamakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:41 
Reasons for voting decision: Spelling and Grammar goes to Con, since Pro misspelled "basketball". Convincing Arguments goes to Con also since Pro did not argue any of Con's statements in round 2.
Vote Placed by PiercedPanda 3 years ago
PiercedPanda
kenziebakerNarutoUzamakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: It his hard to explain, but I believe con had better arguments. Like in the later rounds when she explained how girls play sports. Both sides did pretty bad, but I still believe con did better.
Vote Placed by BeckyDawg 3 years ago
BeckyDawg
kenziebakerNarutoUzamakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: The Con only provided opinion and little reasoning as to why women were better.
Vote Placed by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
kenziebakerNarutoUzamakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gave no organized reasons to suggest that women are better than men, but basically only repeated her stance.
Vote Placed by Gohan12345 3 years ago
Gohan12345
kenziebakerNarutoUzamakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:15 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro pointed out this was opinion and that many of his statement s were wrong. Also pro gave sources