The Instigator
ark428
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Topiarey
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

'Merica

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Topiarey
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/15/2012 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 943 times Debate No: 28232
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

ark428

Pro

I will wait for my opponent to present his points.
Topiarey

Con

I'd like to point out that my opponent listed no arguments for 'Merica, so I'll assume he's debating the pros and cons of the phrase 'Merica. In addition, this is a round one debate, so I basically win by default. Here are my arguments anyway.

1. The term 'Merica preaches totalitarian fascism to children.

The main demographic who are affected by this awful phrase are the teenagers of our country, young adults who are so readily influenced by any source. A phrase like 'Merica instills a dangerous sense of national pride and superiority complex over all other national and ethnic groups contrary to themselves.

You know who supports that type of thing? The fascists of Europe. Mussolini and Hitler.

Does my opponent support Hitler? We will never know. He has not presented an argument.

2. The term 'Merica is stupid and evil.

Again, the demographic this ridiculous phrase affects is influential teenagers. If this group of adolescents are taught to say 'Merica instead of "The United States of America" they will start believing it, similar to the uses of propaganda in FASCIST TOTALITARIAN GERMANY. The use of America in such a way demeans the intelligence of children to use the correct word and is a form of dangerous propaganda.
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by sdwiuhsdfiou 4 years ago
sdwiuhsdfiou
Hi buddy :

HOT SELL Product Brand is below: ==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====
,nike shoes,air jordan shoes,nike s h o x shoes,gucci shoes ,true religion jeans, ed hardy jeans,coogi jeans,affliction
jeans, Laguna Beach Jeans,ed hardy T-shirts,Coogi T-shirts,Christian Audigier T-shirts,Gucci T-shirts,Polo T-shirts,coach
handbag,gucci handbag,prada handbag,chanel handbag .
free shipping
New to Hong Kong : Winter Dress
New era cap $9
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike s h o x(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12
Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18
Come back tomorrow for another Daily Dose of Style! Bookmark this page >>
give you the unexpected harvest

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.fullmalls.com... ) =====

==== ( http://www.scnshop.com... ) =====

Name:LeBron 9 low-3

http://www.fullmalls.com...
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by iamnotwhoiam 4 years ago
iamnotwhoiam
ark428TopiareyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: No resolution. No argument from Pro.
Vote Placed by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
ark428TopiareyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: no arguments, and conduct to con for the pro spamming stupid ass debates.
Vote Placed by Niwsa 4 years ago
Niwsa
ark428TopiareyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct goes to Con since Pro did not provide a resolution.