Mermaids Exist !
Debate Rounds (3)
I have strong evidence for the existence of mermaids or marine ape like creatures based on knowledge we currently have about evolution.
How do you account for the development of wolves into dogs, camels to llamas, land mammals becoming whales, dolphins, seals, otters etc.? Evolution is a fact, change over time is evolution and it is a fact that species sperated and isolated into different ecosystems will adapt and evolve to fit a specific ecosystem. It's not something that you can just say "Doesn't Exist".
May I bring up the fact that all trees are related to each other? Each tree possess similar characteristics to another tree. It does not mean, however, that one tree was made and then other trees evolved from that. basically, that is what people are trying to say with us and other animals. Because we possess similar traits to other animals we must have evolved from them. This is not the case. We were all unique animals, different in our own ways because that is what was intended, not because we have evolved from something else.
(Am I allowed to bring religion into this or am I restricted to science only??)
Everything I stated above can be confirmed online right now.
Second, religion was the very first thing before any revolution. God created the world. God created animals. God created plants. God created humans. There for, your statement of not accepting religion because it came from evolution, makes it able for me to use religion in here. So, to continue on:
The walking on land and then going into water to find food is a myth. (Just like mermaids.) It is something that people made up to try and convince people that evolution is indeed true. I know that everyone keeps trying to prove it to others that evolution is real, but if that is so, then there would be half monkey/half humans in the world right now who are trying to 'evolve' to humans. There are None.
Third, what you have said about whales, actually was just was I said in my previous argument when I said that animals and mammals have similar characteristics to us and to other living creatures. Using that statement was of no use to you.
If you have more to say or argue about anything I just said, please start a new debate on this and I will be glad to prove you wrong again. :)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by gannon260 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||7||0|
Reasons for voting decision: From a scientific standpoint, pro won. Science is a well renown theory therefore a fact in the community. Also con argued against the fact that pro had no evidence while con herself did not have any either. Plus even if God was real, can't he do all things? then why can't he make a mermaid.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.