The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
4 Points

Military intervention in countries, should it be?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/12/2013 Category: People
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,197 times Debate No: 37645
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




Military intervention is an extremely violent and drastic measure that should be undertaken only if extremely necessary. Unfortunately, governments often fail to consider peaceful options, progressing immediately to violence


Hello, dear opponent, although unauthorized and unjustified military intervention is illegal, but the one's which are justified could bring more peace and tranquility to the life of the people in a particularly taken country. As an evidence I would like to take into consideration the war in Georgia(Europe) 08/08/08. Where the Georgian government killed its own citizens, part of them were also having Russian Federation citizenship. Russia invaded and stopped the genocide done by Georgian soldiers
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by funwiththoughts 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro for Con making a 1-round debate, arguments to Pro due to his giving an actual example instead of just bare assertions. Neither used sources though.