The Instigator
lzkeric
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
9spaceking
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

Minecraft should have better default graphics.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
9spaceking
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/23/2014 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 458 times Debate No: 46523
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

lzkeric

Pro

Minecraft should have better default graphics because it hurts your eyes when playing a while. Another reason is because how can the desert look like that? Those cactus looks like cucumber and how do leaves look that big?
9spaceking

Con

I think that minecraft does not have to change its graphics in any way. The game is already complicated as it is--mining blocks so as to create more than just a landscape or a tree--perhaps a house, a maze, or a gigantic castle! The game is cool by the fact that everything is pixelated. The game is required so because there are blocks after blocks to be mined, and furthermore, if a high-definition sheep randomly appeared in the pixel-filled environment, it would seem weird and not natural.
Debate Round No. 1
lzkeric

Pro

lzkeric forfeited this round.
9spaceking

Con

Furthermore, many people agree on the minecraft forum http://www.minecraftforum.net..., saying that texture pacts and lighting mods are available for different people's tastes and that the "low-quality" is part of minecraft! Some users even go so far as to say that the topic is closed and dumb.
So in conclusion, minecraft should keep its default graphics.
Debate Round No. 2
lzkeric

Pro

lzkeric forfeited this round.
9spaceking

Con

Well...he forfeited. Guess he has nothing against me!
Just to reassert my belief...minecraft should keep its default graphics because the public likes it and that's the way the game works.
Debate Round No. 3
lzkeric

Pro

lzkeric forfeited this round.
9spaceking

Con

Forfeit again? Well, my argument remains.
Debate Round No. 4
lzkeric

Pro

lzkeric forfeited this round.
9spaceking

Con

I extend my argument one last time.
Debate Round No. 5
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Rasputin45 3 years ago
Rasputin45
I'd debate it but I'm the wrong age apparently. I would have made the point that the graphics are actually good but people mistake them for bad graphics because it looks like 8-bit. That's the entire aesthetic; everything is a supposedly 8-bit block. By improve what do you mean? Anyway, does this debate really warrant 5 rounds.
Posted by oculus_de_logica 3 years ago
oculus_de_logica
If you're actually serious about this debate I'll accept it.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Actionsspeak 2 years ago
Actionsspeak
lzkeric9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
lzkeric9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Ff
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
lzkeric9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's couple of sentences in argument are not convincing, whilst Con's were at least more convincing. Conduct to Con for Pro's multiple rounds of forfeiting. Con's source was used in an appeal to popularity, yet Pro never pointed that out, so it stands.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 2 years ago
Krazzy_Player
lzkeric9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF