Debate Rounds (3)
First round is acceptance.
Minecraft is laggy
Minecraft has horrible graphics
Minecraft has bad combat.
Minecraft is using the wrong kind of music as it does not match the atmosphere.
Minecraft is an unfinished product because updates on bug fixes are too common. Which also may show microsoft had planned this.
Minecraft is addictive(thats why it also should not be used at school.
Minecraft merchandise are actually scams. You dont need handbooks and just can use the internet
And so minecraft is a below average game.
Minecraft is about building so if you don't like the combat system than go to the creative mode.
Minecraft at least gets constant updates which means 1. There are people who care which means there are people who like it and 2. The Microsoft cares which means it is not a bad game.
Minecraft is addicting therefore it is good.
The game is different from the toys and they work like supposed too do they aren't scams.
http://www.youtube.com...? This is one of the rebuttals i have prepared for. But when it comes to multiplayer its both the company's and computers fault. Servers(multiplayer areas) only says they have one server, which is the reason why im lagging in mineplex . More servers(a place where to store information), less lag. Also i had the mobile PE version and is worst than ever. microsoft is rather stingy and they update something which is from the pc version to the pe version in 6 months+ which is too long( expected to be a month). The xbox version also had proved that mojang totally forgotten to put a tutorial in the pc editition. And even after a the xbox version had been realeased (which had a tutorial). There is still no update giving a tutorial on pc!
Yes i agree minecraft is about building, so thats why they should remove survival mode, which will soon become " survival creative" in the meantime so mostly youtubers like stampylonghead builds creations in "survival mode".
Having constant updates could be planned from the start so minecraft would be fresh.
There are people who care...they actually care less then others, they are sly and uses tricks like :
Save money by making bad graphics which would make the game badly unique ,the update situation stated above and not to spend much money on the game as its already popular and pampered by the community who are giving them maps and mods etc. which could also contain a virus which you may not notice.
There are people who like it is not an appropriate support since this younger kids do not understand what a good game is. A good game is farcry 4, which is highly underrated. Mature games are actually better because it gives the company freedom to do plenty in their games. Sadly more kids play the not rated side of the game as their parents might be promoting it.
Addiction is good? Again one of the rebuttals i have prepared. Addiction is actually BAD. I wonder whether con even knows what addiction is...minecraft is addictive because there are so much things to do so the player cant stop
This are signs of being addicted to minecraft:
Heavy begging to play
Tantrums when stopped
Always talking, thinking and doing minecraft
And this are the consequences:
Affect on studies since can be distracted by minecraft(like writing a book of minecraft in study when parents arent home?)
Getting fever thanks to playing too much
The worst is when you play too much, you can die by exhaustion.
For the toys, they are more of display.
I saw a skydoesminecraft fan toy(he is an inappropriate youtuber) for $34, that fan toy is small and have small butter objects.
Another is captainsparklez slime sword which is $24 is bascially plastic that is too dangerous to be used for fun.
When you say they worked like they are supposed to, its false. A steve and a crafting table toy that i recieved(ugh) cant even craft. Or that slime sword is plastic, and that toy creeper cant even split open.
ClashnBoom forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by gabep 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited. Both had passable but not perfect spelling and grammar. Both made interesting arguments, but I felt that they only scratched the surface of what Minecraft is about. Neither debater used sources, as Pro's link actually doesn't lead anywhere.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.