The Instigator
BirdieMachine
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ConserativeDemocrat
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Minnesota Vikings suck

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
ConserativeDemocrat
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/7/2016 Category: Sports
Updated: 7 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 233 times Debate No: 93449
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

BirdieMachine

Pro

Minnesota Vikings suck because they kept Blair Walsh the choke artist Kicker who missed 15 yards left from 27 yards when it mattered most.

Any winning organization doesn't support chokers and hope they come back to life. A losing organization tries choker again the next year to see if he can choke again.
ConserativeDemocrat

Con

Even though I am a Packers fan, your argument is ridiculous. You are saying the Vikings Organization sucks because they kept a kicker who missed a field goal. First, the obvious. The Vikings went 11-5. That is the best in the NFC North, and 6th in the NFL. That hardly seems like a bad team to me. The Viking's organization made almost 300 million dollars in 2015. That sounds like a great, very sucessful team to me. Not to mention the Vikings made it to the playoffs. So they definitely don't suck.

Now I will address your argument. First, to defend Blair Walsh, the handler put the laces on the football down the wrong way, making it harder to aim. It was also very cold, further hurting Walsh's chances. Finally, there was 10 mph wind during the game. These 3 factors will make a 27 yarder feel a lot harder. Kickers miss field goals. It happens. Only this time, it was much more important then other field goals. Now let's look at Blair Walsh. In 2015, he attempted 39 field goals, and made 34. That is quite good. Walsh is a good kicker. He, like every kicker, just missed a hard field goal. Also, saying the entire organization sucks because they kept Blair Walsh. Walsh is a good kicker, and the Vikings' Team and Organization is quite sucessful. This is why I believe the Minnesota Vikings don't suck.
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by BirdieMachine 7 months ago
BirdieMachine
Meh, I'm a Vikings fan. They needed to cut Walsh and move on. He's going to choke again when it matters most. Vikings do suck because they have zero Superbowls! D:
Posted by jays_slayer 7 months ago
jays_slayer
the holder should have been fired, If he had held the ball, laces out, like he was supposed to Walsh would have never missed that kicked
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by supersosa 7 months ago
supersosa
BirdieMachineConserativeDemocratTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: a whole team doesn't suck for keeping a kicker
Vote Placed by RonaldTrumpkin 7 months ago
RonaldTrumpkin
BirdieMachineConserativeDemocratTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro offered no proper arguments and had no substance whatsoever.
Vote Placed by SchinkBR 7 months ago
SchinkBR
BirdieMachineConserativeDemocratTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Fun topic. But Con clearly has better arguments
Vote Placed by Eshan13 7 months ago
Eshan13
BirdieMachineConserativeDemocratTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro argument was stupid