The Instigator
bigandyiq164
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
BoggyB
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

Modern Science - An unprecedented scam

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
BoggyB
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/9/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 536 times Debate No: 69739
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (1)

 

bigandyiq164

Pro

So if you are in space, you'll notice that things tend to take a spherical form - stars, planets, etc. However, look around your room. How many naturally spherical objects do you see? Not many if any I suspect. For God's sake, the Earth is a sphere! The logic follows that if stars are spheres and planets are spheres, then since we are subjec to the same gravity they are, we should be spheres.
BoggyB

Con

Pro claims that since stars are spheres, and planets are spheres, then anything subject to gravity should also be a sphere. This a very shallow and ignorant contention. Let's take a look at gravity to see what it really is. Gravity is a "force pulling together all matter (which is anything you can physically touch). The more matter, the more gravity, so things that have a lot of matter such as planets and moons and stars pull more strongly." So ever price of matter has a gravitational pull. Everything is pulling against everything else, and the closer two objects are together, the stronger the gravitational pull. The reason everything isn't sticking together is because it simply doesn't have enough matter to create a strong pull. Planets and stars are immensely huge objects the create massive gravitational forces the keep each other in orbit and everything from floating off to one another. All the objects In your room aren't creating enough gravity on themselves to even out the matter they are composed of. So in conclusion, stars and planets crest much larger gravitational pulls, which explains why they are different compared to minuscule objects and pieces of matter that it keeps on its surface.
Debate Round No. 1
bigandyiq164

Pro

bigandyiq164 forfeited this round.
BoggyB

Con

Pro forfeits and concedes, all arguments are extended.
Debate Round No. 2
bigandyiq164

Pro

bigandyiq164 forfeited this round.
BoggyB

Con

Pro forfeits + concedes, all arguments extended, please vote Con, thank you.
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Commondebator 2 years ago
Commondebator
Pro is a source to my entertainment and laughter
Posted by Daniel_Nemes 2 years ago
Daniel_Nemes
Pro is a fool.
Posted by UndeniableReality 2 years ago
UndeniableReality
@"bigandyiq164"
Did someone help you add 100 to your 'IQ' when you signed up with that name?
Posted by RavenDebater 2 years ago
RavenDebater
Resulting to profanity? Not very sportsmanlike
Posted by bigandyiq164 2 years ago
bigandyiq164
F*** off you dumb pr*ck
Posted by NNEye 2 years ago
NNEye
Wow.
Posted by RavenDebater 2 years ago
RavenDebater
You know that other celestial bodies (Asteroids, comets, ect.) are irregularly shaped. Much like the objects in your room they do not contain enough mass to have a strong enough gravitational pull that they collapse in on themselves (Notice that the objects that you listed are super-massive)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
bigandyiq164BoggyBTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff