The Instigator
renji_abarai
Pro (for)
Winning
23 Points
The Contender
kyro90
Con (against)
Losing
17 Points

Mono-word battle

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 9 votes the winner is...
renji_abarai
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/16/2011 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,281 times Debate No: 19904
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (25)
Votes (9)

 

renji_abarai

Pro

I thank my opponent in advance for accepting this debate and I hope he will enjoy it.

This is a word battle where each person will post one word and the voters may decide who posted a better word.

There will be restrictions on the type of word you can use though. The word must be appropriate and must not contain any extra meaning. If the word has multiple meanings, then all of the meanings must be appropriate. The characters of the word must be over 4. The word must also be a word that the person already knows and not a word that he will learn later on.

This debate has two rounds because we will post our word in the second round.

Once again, I thank my opponent for accepting this debate.
kyro90

Con

I accept and thank my opponent for challenging me to this fun debate. Before I start I would like to make a few more rules....
1. No very large words that you cannot spell, nor just to make yourself look smart when you did not even type it correctly...
2. Only ONE WORD no words that have a - in between to connect two words.

Now let the debate begin!
Debate Round No. 1
Debate Round No. 2
25 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by renji_abarai 5 years ago
renji_abarai
It is not innapropriate though. I told what "innapropriate" in this debate means and I am simply pointing out how kyro broke "a rule", "not rules" and the results of breaking hat rule.
Posted by PeacefulChaos 5 years ago
PeacefulChaos
My point is this: you're attacking the voters decisions and I don't take kindly to that. You also attacked kyro's word in the comments section by stating that his word was inappropriate, and the time for debating is over. Thus, I took it into my own hands to show how your word was equally inappropriate, if not greater.
Posted by renji_abarai 5 years ago
renji_abarai
I did not use an "innapropriate word. Mine can be sued in a good and mean way. so can kyro's so therefore, he broke yet another rule. Almost every word can be sued in a good and bad way so by "innapropriate" it means things like cuss words, profanity, or any racial meanings. Because almost any word can be used in a good and bad way, the term "innapropriate is not used as strictly therefore, once again, I have not broken any rules.
Posted by PeacefulChaos 5 years ago
PeacefulChaos
Nevertheless, you broke the rules as well by incorporating an "inappropriate" word. Thus, because you both broke the rules, it boils down to who had the better "word".
Posted by renji_abarai 5 years ago
renji_abarai
This debate specifically was called mono-word battle. If that dosnt signify that this is a "word" battle then I don't know what will -_- I even said word in the rules.
Posted by kyro90 5 years ago
kyro90
I agree that I did not meet the required charecters but none of us said that it didnt not have to be an abriviation.
Posted by renji_abarai 5 years ago
renji_abarai
Just forget all about that. Everything that has been said all comes down to only one point. kyro's word was not over 4 letters so his word is invalid. Therefore, he cannot get any points. Thats all there is to it. He also posted an abbreviation/acronym and the debate is for a word.
Posted by PeacefulChaos 5 years ago
PeacefulChaos
@renji-

When you tell someone they have a lot of fat, you're basically telling them that they're fat. Muscle is fat, but they certainly aren't going to perceive it that way.
Posted by kyro90 5 years ago
kyro90
Oh yeah, I thought it was it can be four letters while thinking if this word was good enough.
Posted by renji_abarai 5 years ago
renji_abarai
That makes it invalid by default. that means you cant get points for votes since it is invalid.
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
renji_abaraikyro90Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: let's be nice, no one will vote on this again, so lets give the points to con
Vote Placed by InVinoVeritas 5 years ago
InVinoVeritas
renji_abaraikyro90Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: acronym =/= word
Vote Placed by PeacefulChaos 5 years ago
PeacefulChaos
renji_abaraikyro90Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: I think Con had a better word, but Pro gets conduct because Con broke the rules. It was probably unintentional, but still . . . Everything else was the same.
Vote Placed by ReformedArsenal 5 years ago
ReformedArsenal
renji_abaraikyro90Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's word wasn't a word, and it wasn't over 4 letters per the rules.
Vote Placed by Crayzman2297 5 years ago
Crayzman2297
renji_abaraikyro90Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:42 
Reasons for voting decision: I only wish this were a multiple argument round debate.
Vote Placed by Maikuru 5 years ago
Maikuru
renji_abaraikyro90Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's word was an acronym and was not over 4 characters. These broken rules mean a loss of conduct and arguments.
Vote Placed by vmpire321 5 years ago
vmpire321
renji_abaraikyro90Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: LOL. Con's word was hilarious... XD
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 5 years ago
jm_notguilty
renji_abaraikyro90Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: CON technically cheated but his was funnier.
Vote Placed by Lordknukle 5 years ago
Lordknukle
renji_abaraikyro90Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: KYPO is not a word, only an acronym.