The Instigator
lightingbolt50
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
drowningdreams
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

Moon landing faked

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/31/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 718 times Debate No: 51296
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)

 

lightingbolt50

Con

I will be arguing that the moon landing WASN'T faked. If you want to debate me, you have to believe the conspiracy theory that the U.S. moon landing was faked and done in a studio.

Round 1: Acceptance
Round 2-4: Arguments
Round 5: Closing Statements
drowningdreams

Pro

I Say the moon landing was fake. In fact all signs point to it being done in a sudio. What do you have to prove that actually happened? Pictures, videos? All of which I can prove wrong.
Debate Round No. 1
lightingbolt50

Con

I am going to debunk the most common reasons people think it was faked. If you have evidence supporting the hoax that I haven't debunked here, make sure to state it and i'll try to debunk it.



1) When the astronauts are putting up the American flag it waves. There is no wind on the Moon.

The flag is held up by a horizontal bar and simply moves when it is unfurled and as the pole is being fixed into position by the astronauts. The flagpole is light, flexible aluminium and continues to vibrate after the astronauts let go, giving the impression of blowing in the wind. Also, why would it be blowing anyway? They were pointing a fan straight at it inside the studio?

2) No stars are visible in the pictures taken by the Apollo astronauts from the surface of the Moon.

The Apollo landing takes place during lunar mornings, with the Sun shining brightly. The stars are not bright enough in this light to be captured in the photographs.

3) No blast crater is visible in the pictures taken of the lunar landing module.

he landing module touches down on solid rock, covered in a layer of fine lunar dust, so there is no reason why it would create a blast crater. Even if the ground were less solid, the amount of thrust being produced by the engines at the point of landing and take off is very low in comparison to a landing on Earth because of the relative lack of gravitational pull.

4) The landing module weighs 17 tons and yet sits on top of the sand making no impression. Next to it astronauts’ footprints can be seen in the sand.

The layer of lunar dust is fairly thin, so the landing module sits on the solid rock. The dust, whilst blown away by the blast from the descent engines, quickly settles back on the ground and is under the astronauts when they begin their moonwalk.

5) The footprints in the fine lunar dust, with no moisture or atmosphere or strong gravity, are unexpectedly well preserved, as if made in wet sand.

The lack of wind on the moon means the footprints in fine, dry lunar dust aren’t blown away in the way they would be if made in a similar substance on Earth.

6) When the landing module takes off from the Moon’s surface there is no visible flame from the rocket.

The rockets in the landing module are powered by fuel containing a combination of hydrazine and dinitrogen tetroxide, which burn with no visible flame.

7) If you speed up the film of the astronauts walking on the Moon’s surface they look like they were filmed on Earth and slowed down.

The best you can say is: yes, a bit, but not really.

8) The astronauts could not have survived the trip because of exposure to radiation from the Van Allen radiation belt.

This claim is largely based on a claim from a Russian cosmonaut. The short time it takes to pass through the belt, combined with the protection from the spacecraft, means any exposure to radiation would be very low.

9) The rocks brought back from the Moon are identical to rocks collected by scientific expeditions to Antarctica.

Some Moon rocks have been found on Earth, but they are all scorched and oxidised from their entry into the Earth’s atmosphere as asteroids. Geologists have confirmed with complete certainty that the Apollo rocks must have been brought from the Moon by man.

10) All six Moon landings happened during the Nixon administration. No other national leader has claimed to have landed astronauts on the Moon, despite 40 years of rapid technological development.

This is a favourite among conspiracy theorists because it needs no evidence but points the finger at the presidency of Richard Nixon. The fact is that after the Apollo landings, the race had been won and the money dried up. The USSR has no interest in coming second, and politicians on both side realised that lower-orbit missions had much greater commercial and military potential.

drowningdreams

Pro

drowningdreams forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
lightingbolt50

Con

...? Come on, I wanted to have a good argument about this. If you don't have time to write something make a basic post and make a better one when you have time. When you forfeit it makes it seem like I cornered you and won.
drowningdreams

Pro

drowningdreams forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
lightingbolt50

Con

lightingbolt50 forfeited this round.
drowningdreams

Pro

drowningdreams forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
lightingbolt50

Con

lightingbolt50 forfeited this round.
drowningdreams

Pro

drowningdreams forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Aceviper2011 3 years ago
Aceviper2011
seriously pro had made not interesting argument at all.
Posted by lightingbolt50 3 years ago
lightingbolt50
Well, reply won't you? Pro, make some actual arguments.
Posted by Bobbysaypie 3 years ago
Bobbysaypie
The moon landing was real, Honestly.
No votes have been placed for this debate.