Moon landing is a hoax
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
| Started: | 3/18/2010 | Category: | Science |
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 1,058 times | Debate No: | 11471 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (7)
|
Let my opponent start the debate
Alright, I will take this one. First, you would have to prove that is was a "hoax", something no one has been able to do so good luck. Your fighting an uphill battle. I really want to see how you will prove what you are instigating here. I just look at some facts. We have verbal evidence of people landing on the moon. A verbal history is significant, and has held up when the men were asked under pressure. They did not wavier or crack. Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. Approximately one fifth of the population of the world watched the live transmission of the first Apollo moonwalk.[38] I will start here and see where your proof comes from. http://en.wikipedia.org... |
![]() |
|
rustypeople forfeited this round.
Extend my last round! |
![]() |
|
rustypeople forfeited this round.
Well, this was no good. Sorry guys. Extend my first round! And vote for me!!!! |
![]() |
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 1 year ago
| rustypeople | comoncents | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: Obvious.
Vote Placed by Man-is-good 1 year ago
| rustypeople | comoncents | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Radford University wins it against Einstein, since he left the building after only one round in the game...
Vote Placed by ethopia619 2 years ago
| rustypeople | comoncents | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 2 years ago
| rustypeople | comoncents | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Vote Placed by rougeagent21 3 years ago
| rustypeople | comoncents | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by sherlockmethod 3 years ago
| rustypeople | comoncents | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by comoncents 3 years ago
| rustypeople | comoncents | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |

















I guess? I just do not see how a Pro can win. It would be so hard to prove or convince a person what they have believed to be true their whole life?
Yep. Read this debate here and have a laugh.
http://www.debate.org...
I'm gonna laugh if he forfeits.