The Instigator
prodigyofaristotle
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
vi_spex
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Morals Do Not Exist(Objectively)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/26/2016 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 354 times Debate No: 93117
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (10)
Votes (0)

 

prodigyofaristotle

Pro

Objective morality does not exist. All morals are created by men in order to serve purpose or agenda.
vi_spex

Con

1, if morality is subjective, how is it moral
2, if morality is all subjective how can you be immoral

can it be moral to eat deadly poisonous mushrooms to stay healthy?
Debate Round No. 1
prodigyofaristotle

Pro

No one is immoral or moral in an objective view point. What is good to one person may be bad to another. There is no objective morality that exists. Because morality is subjective it is only moral based on your viewpoint and subjective morals. The same answer applies to your deadly mushrooms. If you think it is moral than it is. If you do not than it is not.
vi_spex

Con

thats my point.. if reality is whatever you say clearly it dosnt exist

then morality dosnt exist, and it is not subjective.. subjectivity exist, and it is not moral
Debate Round No. 2
prodigyofaristotle

Pro

Your argument does not prove your point. Give me a set of objective morals that every human follows. You simply can not. Objective morals do not exist. It is a subjective concept created by man.
vi_spex

Con

poison=Unhealthy
logical=dont eat poisonous things to stay healthy
illogical=eat poisonous things to stay healthy(religion)
Debate Round No. 3
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
i think control is subjective

i dont know if subjective or objective is the right way to describe it canis.. its like a subjective answer

yeeea
Posted by Grandzam 1 year ago
Grandzam
I would vote on this, but I'm not a genius so it wouldn't be fair to vote on this debate.
Posted by Grandzam 1 year ago
Grandzam
I would vote on this, but I'm not a genius so it wouldn't be fair to vote on this debate.
Posted by canis 1 year ago
canis
I do not know. I was just on a 4 week "survivel" trip. .My mate got a wounded knee and could not surply his part of the needed calories, And I could not suply enought fore both of us .We had to cut it down to 3 weeks fore "safety"....The only moral was "continued" existance...Of course it is a subjective approuch...But could it be any different..? The pure objective decistion does not exist fore the subject. It is a subjective decition that makes it possible fore the subject to objectively to exist.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
thats my point.. if reality is whatever you say clearly morality dosnt exist
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
suicide is immoral
Posted by HomelySherlock 1 year ago
HomelySherlock
vi_spex is not the hero we deserve, but the hero we need.
Posted by Furyan5 1 year ago
Furyan5
lol. eating deadly, poisonous mushrooms to stay healthy is not immoral. it's stupid. Feeding deadly, poisonous mushrooms to others and telling them it's healthy would be immoral.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
no morality involved
Posted by Mission4Christ 1 year ago
Mission4Christ
Morals have been created by humans to justify God.
http://www.mission-forchrist.com...
No votes have been placed for this debate.