Mortal Kombat is better than Street Fighter.
Debate Rounds (2)
Starting with that for one, why is the BOSS A PLAYABLE CHARACTER?
Feels weird, and I don't get why they at least would make him good for a boss.
I also will say, that most of the costumes and characters are extremely
Like Ryu, he's an average karate-boxing guy, and we have a fat guy, some quick girl,
and a small girl that speaks some native language and attacks with an annoying voice.
Not just that, but Capcom hasn't released another Street Fighter since 2009, and NetherRealm Studios only took 3 years to release another one.
Sure, the costumes in Mortal Kombat are slightly inappropriate, and the ninjas are often retextures, but Mortal Kombat is unique, with more advanced AL, and more combos and things like that.
Personally, I like how Street Fighter is more for kids, but can't they do something more unique for it?
Street Fighter weren't unique at all, but pretty typical. And fatalities are unique to every fighting game besides it alone.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Atmas 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't give a reason for their side and instead relied on personal opinion. The blood, Gore, and fatalities are the main attraction of Mortal Kombat. Had Con talked about the fast fighting speed of Street Fighter, the age of it, and it's larger fan base due to its kid friendly atmosphere, they might have stood a better chance.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.