The Instigator
johnlubba
Pro (for)
Losing
7 Points
The Contender
Heineken
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

Most enjoyable short film science videos.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Heineken
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/4/2012 Category: Science
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,994 times Debate No: 27774
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (28)
Votes (5)

 

johnlubba

Pro

Welcome to this fun challenge and thank you for accepting, It is my hope we both enjoy each others videos and give ourselves and the audience some entertaining material.
It would be nice to win this but it is not that important, what's more important is that we learn from each other and maybe offer the audience some entertaining food for thought.
Thanks again.

Rules
First round is acceptance
1: Video per round, must be based on science, ten minutes max.

The very best of luck.
Heineken

Con

I accept. Thank you for furnishing the topic.
Debate Round No. 1
johnlubba

Pro

Welcome Heineken, Thanks for you particpation in this fun challenge.

I hope you enjoy this post.
Heineken

Con

You want to see naked egg bounce? You watch and enjoy. That does.
Ahw, shiet!

Debate Round No. 2
johnlubba

Pro

Thanks Heineken

That was enjoyable and also entertaining, I will dedicate the next round to the theme of comical science videos.
Hope you get the humour.
Heineken

Con

A scientifc documentary about the Homosexual Menace
Debate Round No. 3
johnlubba

Pro

Here is my contribution for the third round.
Heineken

Con

Jesus explains the Big Bang and Evolution to his disciples.
Debate Round No. 4
johnlubba

Pro

That was entertaining, It's been fun.

Here is my last post.
Heineken

Con

This video carries the burden.
It's most enjoyable.
It's short.
It's a science video.

Welcome to the world of Magnets!
Debate Round No. 5
28 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by johnlubba 4 years ago
johnlubba
Well done Henieken.

Congrats.
Posted by badger 4 years ago
badger
lol
Posted by Heineken 4 years ago
Heineken
......Retarded....
Posted by Heineken 4 years ago
Heineken
I think the debate was retarded. I think anyone who found any scientific value in the debate is retarded. I also think that feeling passionately about your performance in this debate is retarded.
Not like "politically correct" retarded, but "long tounge, tiny eyes, heavy mouth breathing" retarded.

Retarded, retarded, retarded!!!!
Posted by badger 4 years ago
badger
i attacked the idea, not the person :P
Posted by johnlubba 4 years ago
johnlubba
Do not insult me by calling me retarded. I am reporting you comment for abuse.

And the irony is you are giving points for conduct when you have very little yourself.
Posted by johnlubba 4 years ago
johnlubba
Suit yourself.
Posted by badger 4 years ago
badger
trying to justify a sources vote at all in this debate is retarded.
Posted by badger 4 years ago
badger
that's it, heineken's getting the conduct vote, too.
Posted by badger 4 years ago
badger
jesus is our lord and saviour...

this is definitely because i'm black, isn't it?
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Microsuck 4 years ago
Microsuck
johnlubbaHeinekenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: The video that won it for me was the one where Jesus explains the BBT and evolution to his followers and the magnets. Magnets and Evolution FTW!!!
Vote Placed by badger 4 years ago
badger
johnlubbaHeinekenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: heineken pwned. i gave one half lol at einstein mocking stephen hawking's chair but it was all downhill again after that. nasally voiced singing isn't enjoyable. my bad. adam and evolution, gay jokes, farting yellow people and retarded polish bouncing eggs are awesome. and also magnets but that video sucked.
Vote Placed by Nur-Ab-Sal 4 years ago
Nur-Ab-Sal
johnlubbaHeinekenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:20 
Reasons for voting decision: countering badger's sources vote, that makes no sense, especially when Pro's videos had more reputable scientists to begin with...
Vote Placed by UltimateSkeptic 4 years ago
UltimateSkeptic
johnlubbaHeinekenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: "We are star dust" Loved it. Pro and Con had nice videos, I preferred Pro.
Vote Placed by Muted 4 years ago
Muted
johnlubbaHeinekenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:23 
Reasons for voting decision: both had nice videos, but con's were slightly better with magnets. No reading required indeed.