The Instigator
adamhall
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Teemo
Pro (for)
Winning
15 Points

Motion: TTHW allow corporations to pay higher salaries to employees who agree not to have children

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Teemo
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/15/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 480 times Debate No: 52595
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

adamhall

Con

I invite anybody
Teemo

Pro

Since this is a 1 round argument, and my opponent didn't make any argument, me even making anything valid gives me an automatic win. This motion is a good thing. The reason being that when people have children, they take more days off, and have to take maternity leave. Corporations find this tedious, and thus giving people who agree not to have children higher salaries. Those peThis is a fair motion. Since I am the only one with an argument, I automatically win.

Childless workers do not recieve any tax refunds from the EITC. Because of such, they are dropping into poverty.

" Through those three features, the tax code pushed 1.2 million childless workers into poverty and another 5.8 million deeper into poverty in 2012."[1]

Corpertaions giving childless workers a higher salary is just due to the fact they don't recieve any money from the EITC. So if the TTHW allows corpertaions to do such, it should be accepted because it is fair and just.

SOURCE:
[1].http://www.newrepublic.com...

My opponent presents no argument, whereas I have. I also posted a reliable source, and had superior grammar because they wrote "I invite anybody" which is wrong grammar. Since they presented no argument, I believe I had superior conduct as well. Please vote pro.



Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Relativist 2 years ago
Relativist
adamhallTeemoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: 1 round.. No arguments by con... Pro wins.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 2 years ago
Geogeer
adamhallTeemoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Kinda one sided. Con should make sure that he understands the rules he set forth.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
adamhallTeemoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: con failed. Noob snipe!