Motor Cycles Should Not Be So Loud
Debate Rounds (2)
It is too often that you hear of a motorcycle accident on the highway or busy road outside a city. And why, you might ask, would motorcycles be so prone to accidents? This because they are so small. The cars around them are much larger and more protected. If motorcycles were quiet, they would not be noticed by the abundant text-and-drive population and will be hit. If producers wanted the motorcycles to be quieter, then they could easily do that. It is a question of safety, not comfort.
Most people have their radio blasting while driving or have the news on and can't hear motor cyclists. Modern cars are also so well insulated for engine and road noise that they block out motorcycle's engine sounds unless the motor cyclists is right beside the car and by then there is a visual.
The issue is one of noise pollution. Bikes are loud because they sell better being so. The bike entire industry is largely based on hyper macho nonsense that the rest of the community has to deal with. It isn't fair for a minority to impact on the quality of life of all others because of mere posturing. The bikes would perform pretty well the same with better mufflers. The cyclists are giving up very little by adhering to better noise standards.
First of all, if you want to live in an apartment in a big city, the nit is your choice to hear motorcycles all night. And if you can hear motorcycles, then you can hear cars too. People have a right to get where they need to go. You know, you may not think about it over all of your complaints, but that may be all they can afford to get them somewhere on time. For all you know, they are on their way to the hospital. And if you really wanted to block out the sound, get a sound proof window. They sell them at most hardware stores. Just think about THAT next time you get oh so bothered by a fellow American citizen on a motorcycle.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by twilke 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Great debate! I would have given it to con but his biggest arguement came in the last round, which is unfair to pro.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.