The Instigator
Max.Wallace
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Trisgav
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Mujahideen, goats arse.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/14/2016 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 386 times Debate No: 84984
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (0)

 

Max.Wallace

Pro

They enslave women.
Trisgav

Con

I accept said debate as my first debate on this site. Hopefully, we will have a great debate with well-thought out with a fair-minded outcome.

Now since the opposition has so graciously defined this debate under the title and his beginning statement I will reiterate what we are arguing.

Definitions

Mujahideen: A mujahid is one who strives or struggles on behalf of Islam; mujahideen is the plural of the same word. The word mujahid is an Arabic participle drawn from the same root as the Arabic word jihad, to strive or struggle. In other forms these are guerilla fighters of the Islamic people typically fighting non-Muslims.

Goats arse: A goat or a hardy domesticated ruminant animal's anus.

So I, the Con of the debate will be arguing that someone who strives or struggles on the behalf of Islam even in a time of war is not an animal's anus. I accept. BoP is shared, and Pro has to explain why Mujahideen is goats arse. BoP stands for the burden of proof.

Sources :

http://middleeast.about.com...
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...
http://dictionary.reference.com...
http://dictionary.reference.com...
Debate Round No. 1
Max.Wallace

Pro

They are men that force women to wear burkhas, or stone them to death. Sometimes. That is enough for me to not defend them, but for you..........? Better get your burkha on bitch, right?
Trisgav

Con

Rebuttal: While the Pro has resorted to ad hominem in his earlier statement he has left no evidence and thinly veiled insults as his "proof". If more information of his comes to light I'd be happy to refute him. He has failed to show proof towards his arguments and quite frankly hasn't addressed the argument at hand, that Islamic supporters are "goats arse"

Definitions:
Ad hominem: Resorting to insulting the person, not addressing the argument

Arguments:

1. A human can not be other animals fecal duct except with extensive surgery. This is evident by basic anatomy. If Islamic guerilla fighters were, in fact, abnormal then there would be a case to be had. As the evidence so far suggests by news of jihadists they have normal human anatomy or we would be aware of a difference in the media.

Thank you, and vote Con!

Sources:
http://www.innerbody.com...
http://global-security-news.com...
Debate Round No. 2
Max.Wallace

Pro

So are you ISIS scientist, or what? You are defending burkhas.
Trisgav

Con

In this debate, I have challenged Pro's position that Mujahideen or jihadists are a "goat's arse," or in other words a goat's anus. My opposition has accused me of being a burkha wearing ISIS scientist which is impossible due to a combination of geographic location, race, religious views, and general views in regards to ISIS. As I have stated in defense of my statement, a jihadist, no matter their actions being immoral or not can not be animal's anus without prior surgery.

I greatly appreciate my first debate opportunity and am looking forward to my next. Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Max.Wallace 1 year ago
Max.Wallace
Nope. Enslaving women is bad. You need better reading skills. I blame your medrozza.
Posted by Trisgav 1 year ago
Trisgav
Since I'm so amazing at using this sites comment section(totally didn't break it mid typing) I would like to expand on my earlier comment. As I asked earlier, are you arguing that someone in the act of jihad is bad?
Posted by Trisgav 1 year ago
Trisgav
So I have a quick question, I feel the need to clarify what we are arguing, so the way I read the situation you are arguing mujahideen (someone in the act of jihad) is bad, or in your words "goats arse."
Posted by persianimmortal 1 year ago
persianimmortal
Should I take this one too? lol
No votes have been placed for this debate.