The Instigator
Dwarfmoi
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
johnathonwill65
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Murders should be executed

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/17/2013 Category: Education
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 7,344 times Debate No: 35701
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)

 

Dwarfmoi

Pro

Ill make my first arguement when someone accepts.
johnathonwill65

Con

better late than never?? I accept. state your case
Debate Round No. 1
Dwarfmoi

Pro

Murderers Should Be Executed
Murderers should be executed because they have taken a life on purpose. This is very important because a life cannot be brought back, no matter what you do. The death sentence for murder now is a life in prison. That is not right because if a murderer kills someone, the murderer should be killed. " An eye for an eye" is a famous quote, which means that if someone breaks your arm you can break his. This quote and its meaning is very important and should be a law. Therefore, if a murderer kills a person, the murder will be killed.
Also, if murderers were sentenced to life, there would be many problems. Jails would be overcrowded. It would be difficult to build more jails because it would cost to much. The U.S is in a $16 trillion debt. There is no space to build more jails because jails are very costly. We cannot hold more prisoners in jails

If a city had no rule to kill murderers, then there would be no fear of death by them. That would lead to more murders on the street. No one would fear death because they can"t be killed. Therefore, if we kill murders that deserve to die, then there will be less crime. Therefore it is a good idea to execute murders. The murders deserve to die because of what they did.
Another reason why murderers should be executed is because the family of the victims suffer, If a family member is murdered if it fair to the family of the murderer is freed? The family is suffering because they will never see their loved one again while the murderer is easting a sandwich in jail.
johnathonwill65

Con

johnathonwill65 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Dwarfmoi

Pro

I hope my opponent comes on the next round.
johnathonwill65

Con

johnathonwill65 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
You can edit it now, definitions added mid-argument may be rejected, and it drags the argument down badly.
Posted by Dwarfmoi 4 years ago
Dwarfmoi
Oh thank you. I will when i have an opponent.
I thank you for your advice.
Posted by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
Welcome to the site. You may wish to define murderers, and if it's all, or most.
No votes have been placed for this debate.