The Instigator
Aerogant
Pro (for)
Winning
8 Points
The Contender
J03ybatts
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

My Analysis On Riemann's Hypothesis > Your Analysis On Riemann's Hypothesis

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Aerogant
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/12/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 558 times Debate No: 60392
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (6)
Votes (4)

 

Aerogant

Pro

Rules: There is no "Acceptance Round".

This is a philosophical debate, not a political debate, therefore in order to argue properly, you can only use analysis and a consensus; you cannot look for an answer, or make claims.

Who ever can show best that they understand Riemann's Hypothesis, let alone solve it, will win this debate.

Riemann's Hypothesis can be searched by you from any source, but you must research "Riemann's Hypothesis".

First Analysis: "Considering that the Riemann's hypothesis dealt with numbers which created an infinite sequence, that was then curious towards why the numbers contained half values, the reason behind it was then posited to be the the imaginary units within a real value, which resonates in my brain for I am aware that 2+2=5 based on Einstein's theory or that the entire Universe is based on the Fibonacci Sequence and the Golden Ratio, which is to say that knowing that math is based on the entire Universe, having knowledge of how the Universe seems to be "skipping" numbers, is 'enough information to suppose that the Riemann's hypothesis is truly relational to how the Universe creates both, genuine matter and imaginary matter, hence why the human mind can create both real things and false things' - math is based on the human mind, which is why our emotions are based on Newton's Law. I may not be able to read the thousands of names and labels they gave this formula - I am able to tell what this formula is relating to by its pinnacle of interest. Therefore the Riemann's hypothesis is directing us towards a truth that explains why the Universe manages to create false units and true units within the space and matter which are based on the previously aforementioned designs. If anyone wants to solve this mystery, I suggest them to combine the knowledge of everything I mentioned, as this formula reflects on Einstein's theory, the behavior of the imagination and the reality we live in, the Golden Ratio, the Fibonacci Sequence and possibly other things I have yet to read on. "

P.S This was originally for 'saboosa', but they knew they would lose to a mature debate, so they immediately declined to protect their whimsical image.
Debate Round No. 1
Aerogant

Pro

Address my points. I turned Riemann's Hypothesis into a possible conclusion that may reveal the secrets to why a human brain contains imagination and a reality. You have not addressed this genius question - address the points!
J03ybatts

Con

J03ybatts forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Aerogant

Pro

You can't spell analysis without anal and sis - you will have to go deep, and you'll have to do it questionably.

P.S I do not condone biological abominations and actions that result in biological abominations.
J03ybatts

Con

J03ybatts forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Aerogant

Pro

Do people love me? Or do people love their perception of me? Then what is love?
J03ybatts

Con

J03ybatts forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Aerogant

Pro

It's strange how it all works.

You piece yourself together; the world falls apart.

You tear yourself into pieces; the world comes together.
J03ybatts

Con

J03ybatts forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by Aerogant 2 years ago
Aerogant
Fair enough.
Posted by TruthHurts 2 years ago
TruthHurts
I'm just pointing out that they're the same. Nothing further than that.
Posted by Aerogant 2 years ago
Aerogant
Actually, I wrote it before that on this site, but you didn't dig deep enough because you're too busy attempting to condescend me, when I frequent other places.
Posted by TruthHurts 2 years ago
TruthHurts
Wow, that paragraph looks familiar.

http://onlinephilosophyclub.com...
Posted by Aerogant 2 years ago
Aerogant
Stop making excuses.

Walk the talk, girl.
Posted by saboosa 2 years ago
saboosa
I know i would win but battling you is tiring because you cannot debate properly.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
AerogantJ03ybattsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: "Fack off" does not qualify as an argument, so arguments go to Pro. Conduct goes to Pro despite Pro's less than ideal conduct, Con's was simply abhorrent.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
AerogantJ03ybattsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: con did nothing to contest pro
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 2 years ago
birdlandmemories
AerogantJ03ybattsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Better conduct, even with forfeiting
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 2 years ago
bladerunner060
AerogantJ03ybattsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: This debate was nonsense.