The Instigator
Rational_Thinker9119
Pro (for)
Winning
28 Points
The Contender
imabench
Con (against)
Losing
13 Points

My Opponent Will Lose This Debate

Do you like this debate?NoYes+5
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
Rational_Thinker9119
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/29/2013 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,445 times Debate No: 37139
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (14)
Votes (7)

 

Rational_Thinker9119

Pro

Rule 1: If a rule is broken (directly or indirectly), then an automatic 7 point forfeit results for whoever broke the rule, assuming that rule applies to them.

Rule 2: Rules with a * directly beside them only apply to my opponent

*Rule 3: First round is just for acceptance

*Rule 4: In every round, every other letter must be a capital letter, with the remaining letters being lower case letters, starting with a lower case letter (For example, "aBcDeF..." but obviously they don't have to be in alphabetical order). This rule must be applied to each line individually.

Rule 5: No contesting a rule after the debate has been accepted

Have fun, and good luck! I don't why I decided to do this but it should be entertaining ha

imabench

Con

aCcEpTeD

sTaTe YoUr CaSe
Debate Round No. 1
Rational_Thinker9119

Pro

I thank my opponent for accepting this debate. However, my opponent broke *Rule 3:

"*Rule 3: First round is just for acceptance"

Note the just...

Now, if you notice my opponent's first round, it is as follows:

"aCcEpTeD


sTaTe YoUr CaSe"


If you review the above, you will realize that my opponent did not just accept the debate, but he added and unnecessary statement ("sTaTe YoUr CaSe"). Rule 3 specifically states that the first round is just for acceptance, that excludes any unnecessary statements that aren't an acceptance such as "sTaTe YoUr CaSe".

Since my opponent did not just accept the debate, and included extra illegal commentary, he broke *Rule 3. This means he lost the debate due to Rule 1:

"Rule 1: If a rule is broken (directly or indirectly), then an automatic 7 point forfeit results for whoever broke the rule"

Vote Pro.
imabench

Con

I was just being polite you retarded slut pirate
Debate Round No. 2
Rational_Thinker9119

Pro

Rules are rules. Also, your name calling violates conduct as well.
imabench

Con

Nigga please..... It's a 7 point forfeit as set up by your rules, I already lost the conduct vote
Debate Round No. 3
Rational_Thinker9119

Pro

Yes, but I wasn't talking about points by mentioning conduct....I just wanted you to feel really really guilty.
imabench

Con

The only thing I feel guilty about is not calling your mom the morning after I f***ed her ;D
Debate Round No. 4
14 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
WOW IMPOSSIBLE! THE TROLL GOT TROLLED!! And I thought imabench was the only debater capable of winning this debate. Looks like I was wrong!
Posted by Rational_Thinker9119 3 years ago
Rational_Thinker9119
Only Pirate I see is you Captain Jack lol
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
Ah relax, youre still gonna win

you slut pirate
Posted by Rational_Thinker9119 3 years ago
Rational_Thinker9119
Sargon trolling me because I beat him in this exact debate before lol
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
f*ck, on the last line I meant subtract one not add one
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
Sitara, pick an odd number between 1 and 100

Then subtract by 1

Then divide by 2

Then add 1

Then multiply by 2

Then subtract the original number

Then add 1

Thats how many f*cks I give about what you think here :)
Posted by SitaraPorDios 3 years ago
SitaraPorDios
I support RationalThinker. His conduct is better and he was more respectful.
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
James, please win at least one debate a year...
Posted by jamestheawesomeperson 3 years ago
jamestheawesomeperson
imabench, please stop being a tool...
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
Accountant, it doesn't work that way
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by Bullish 3 years ago
Bullish
Rational_Thinker9119imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Come at me and and CVB me brah.
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
Rational_Thinker9119imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Just throwing bench a bone here. Pro still wins.
Vote Placed by Magic8000 3 years ago
Magic8000
Rational_Thinker9119imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Rules were broken by Con. Trolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololollolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololo
Vote Placed by bsh1 3 years ago
bsh1
Rational_Thinker9119imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Really, Con? You could have won that...
Vote Placed by Sargon 3 years ago
Sargon
Rational_Thinker9119imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to answer Con's point about Pro being a slut-pirate and how Con had sex with his mother and didn't call her back.
Vote Placed by funwiththoughts 3 years ago
funwiththoughts
Rational_Thinker9119imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: While I don't agree that Con broke *Rule 3, he indisputably DID break *Rule 4.
Vote Placed by TUF 3 years ago
TUF
Rational_Thinker9119imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Lol the resolution was upheld, but Kudos to Imabench for making me Lolz