The Instigator
boxxybabee
Pro (for)
Losing
29 Points
The Contender
studentathletechristian8
Con (against)
Winning
64 Points

My name is boxxybabee

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/29/2009 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 5,738 times Debate No: 10271
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (14)

 

boxxybabee

Pro

My debate.org profile name is boxxybabee.

Refute it.
studentathletechristian8

Con

I negate, "My name is boxxybabee."

On the user boxxybabee's profile, her name is listed as "-Private-". Therefore, her name is not boxxybabee, but
-Private-.
http://www.debate.org...

Although the debate.org profile name is not specified by the resolution, my opponent is incorrect when she says it is "boxxybabee." The name "boxxybabee" (without the period) is her true profile name. Resolution negated.

I thank the audience and my opponent. Almost an impossible debate.
Debate Round No. 1
boxxybabee

Pro

boxxybabee, boxxybabee., it does not matter unfortunately.

It is like saying "God. exists." Does his inherent title cease to exist because of a punctuation mark?

Thus, boxxybabee is my profile name.
studentathletechristian8

Con

The resolution solely regards your name, and according to your profile, your name is -Private-, which negates the resolution.

You are still incorrect about your profile name. You stated that it was "boxybabee.", and it is not. There is no period.

I have negated both my opponent's name and profile name. This debate really is almost impossible to win for Con, but I believe I have delivered a decent fight. I await argumentation.
Debate Round No. 2
boxxybabee

Pro

So like, hurrr durrr.

http://ui15.gamespot.com...

Weegee, pedobear, fsjal, YOUR ARGUMENT IS INVALID. BECAUSE NICHOLAS CAGE'S HAIR IS A BIRD.

Also, never refuted my point about how a period actually changes the meaning.

and it's boxxybabee, bro. Two x's.

XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO hugs and kisses :3 <33333
studentathletechristian8

Con

My opponent has still failed to effectively refute my points.

The period changes the meaning because technically your profile name does not have a period, so I have refuted your argument regarding the "boxxybabee" with a period.

I heavily urge a Con vote. My arguments stand. I did enjoy that picture, though.
Debate Round No. 3
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by studentathletechristian8 7 years ago
studentathletechristian8
Cody, I've actually received several comments along the lines of, "SAC8, I would expect better" or "SAC8, you are better than this." I don't understand. This is a debating website, and I'm debating. Personally, I refrain from expecting much of others until they do something worthy of noting, which I have not.
Posted by Nails 7 years ago
Nails
I voted CON because PRO didn't actually say anything at all in the last rebuttal. That aside, I think PRO honestly would have won this. She specifies 'profile name' in round 1 and the period was used as ending punctuation.
Posted by Cody_Franklin 7 years ago
Cody_Franklin
But, like I said, when the arguments actually get to the point of "Your name doesn't actually have a period on the end, therefore, I win" seems a little off to me. Just because it's one of the most ridiculous debates doesn't mean that it requires one of the most ridiculous arguments. Two wrongs don't make a right. ;)
Posted by Danielle 7 years ago
Danielle
I don't think it's stooping to their level. I think it's actually the opposite.

I did a debate like this too ~ http://www.debate.org...
Posted by Cody_Franklin 7 years ago
Cody_Franklin
Actually, sac, I didn't criticize Pro because she didn't deserve to hear criticism. It was that bad on her part. Lol. I'm just sad for seeing you stoop down to such a low level because of a debate like this. :(
Posted by studentathletechristian8 7 years ago
studentathletechristian8
Appreciated, L ;)

I just felt the topic was ridiculous, so why not create ridiculous argumentation?
Posted by Danielle 7 years ago
Danielle
Damn Cody, this was a dumb a-ss debate to begin with... are you seriously criticizing sac's argument here given Pro's retardation? Haha, kudos to Con for the arguments (which by the way went unrefuted whereas Pro's was, so either way Con wins).
Posted by wonderwoman 7 years ago
wonderwoman
it indeed was very much so sarcasm seeing as she specified her debate.org profile name is boxxxabee or w/e it is
Posted by studentathletechristian8 7 years ago
studentathletechristian8
You know what Cody, I did the best with what I was given. Was this not a ridiculous debate in the frist place?
Posted by Cody_Franklin 7 years ago
Cody_Franklin
Con's argument about her name being -Private- is false, since she specified her profile name, not to mention that it was a really sh!tty semantic argument (as far as quality), no offense intended.

Con's other argument about the period is also incorrect, because it assumes that the period is being used as part of the name, and not as ending punctuation. Another fail.

I'm not even going to vote on this debate.
14 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by studentathletechristian8 6 years ago
studentathletechristian8
boxxybabeestudentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Grey_Lens 7 years ago
Grey_Lens
boxxybabeestudentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:51 
Vote Placed by Data 7 years ago
Data
boxxybabeestudentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Crush 7 years ago
Crush
boxxybabeestudentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by jl153 7 years ago
jl153
boxxybabeestudentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by ReginaldJeeves 7 years ago
ReginaldJeeves
boxxybabeestudentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by GeorgeCarlinWorshipper 7 years ago
GeorgeCarlinWorshipper
boxxybabeestudentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Nails 7 years ago
Nails
boxxybabeestudentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Danielle 7 years ago
Danielle
boxxybabeestudentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by homieq 7 years ago
homieq
boxxybabeestudentathletechristian8Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:34