The Instigator
Wylted
Pro (for)
Winning
24 Points
The Contender
CommunistDog
Con (against)
Losing
2 Points

My opponent should go Fvck himself.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Wylted
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/30/2015 Category: Economics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 934 times Debate No: 74572
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (28)
Votes (5)

 

Wylted

Pro

My opponent should go fvck him or herself.

(The V is meant as a U)

Rounds are 12 hours long, go fvck yourself.

500 characters, now again go fornicate yourself, jerk.
CommunistDog

Con

UR STATEMENT IS INVALID! #Trololol
Debate Round No. 1
Wylted

Pro

For men masterbation helps to prevent cancer, boosts a person's mood and helps them keep erections better as they age. http://www.menshealth.com...

Women also get many health benefits from masterbating. Masterbation reduces menstraul cramps, increase your ability to reach orgasm easier and helps with sleep.

http://www.wewomen.com...

con is eithe male or female. Resolution affirmed
CommunistDog

Con

Your original claim says fvck. fvck is not a real word. what are you trying to prove O_O
Debate Round No. 2
Wylted

Pro

In round one, I clarify that the V is a substitute for the letter u. My elaboration on the resolution in round one takes care of that problem, the reason for the letter substitution is due to the sites filtering system.
CommunistDog

Con

Firstly, does it really? A "V" has meaning in this world. A "V" is not an excuse for a "U". It is a prideful letter, a unique one! While you do not respect the letter "V," I praise it!

Secondly, I would like to say, I'm a girl. Instead of "himself," you should have said "herself." Thus, YOUR ARGUMENT IS INVALID!
Debate Round No. 3
Wylted

Pro

The voters should tell my opponent to go fvck herself by voting for me in this debate.

The title of the debate is separate, but related to the resolution. I clarified what the resolution meant in round one, where I explicitly stated that I used a V instead of a U to get around the sites filtering method. I also clarified the resolution in round one by adding the word herself to it as well.

I urge the voters to reread round one, and I urge my opponent to go fvck herself.

No new arguments. Go
CommunistDog

Con

I would like to say, that.... I like pie. AND FOR THIS REASON AND THIS REASON ONLY, I should win.
Debate Round No. 4
28 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
Oh, lol. Maybe they weren't aware of the many benefits associated with masterbation before the debate.
Posted by Diqiucun_Cunmin 1 year ago
Diqiucun_Cunmin
I was surprised that they were convinced by a troll debate...
Posted by Diqiucun_Cunmin 1 year ago
Diqiucun_Cunmin
I meant the voters
Posted by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
How did I switch sides
Posted by Diqiucun_Cunmin 1 year ago
Diqiucun_Cunmin
What's with the people switching sides from Communistdog to Wylted before and after the debate o_0
Posted by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
Okay I won't :)
Posted by Nivek 1 year ago
Nivek
Wylted, I love <3 you!!!!

Please don't say "go fvck yourself" to me like you said to everyone else!!!!!! Otherwise you will tear my heart apart :(
Posted by Lumberjay85 1 year ago
Lumberjay85
CommunistDog still has another round, but unless it is a spectacular retaliation, you pretty much got this one, Wylted.

I also wanted to mention to CommunistDog, you being a girl, thus invalidating the debate, is in itself, invalid. In many language, when the gender is unknown, you default to the masculine form. This doesn't mean it is specifically referring to a male, it's just a way to keep it in singular form without objectifying, i.e., using "itself."
Posted by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
Oh and I almost forgot.....

Go fvck yourself
Posted by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
That is a good argument. Wish I would've thought of it, but that doesn't change the fact that I've clearly done enough to win and meet the resolution.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Jack.Jameswood1 1 year ago
Jack.Jameswood1
WyltedCommunistDogTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro provided simple premises with reasons and evidence that linked directly to the resolution. Pro also receives sources because the sources provided by Pro in the second round are related to and support the resolution.
Vote Placed by Lumberjay85 1 year ago
Lumberjay85
WyltedCommunistDogTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:61 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's argument was well written. Con received the conduct points not because of the resolution, but because of the third round where pro says, "The voters should tell my opponent to go fvck herself by voting for me in this debate."
Vote Placed by DomriRade4444 1 year ago
DomriRade4444
WyltedCommunistDogTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:51 
Reasons for voting decision: Such a troll debate, but pro explained why masturbating is positive on the whole. He had sources and con didn't, but his grammar was terrible. Conduct was impossible to judge.
Vote Placed by joetheripper117 1 year ago
joetheripper117
WyltedCommunistDogTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro simply had better arguments. They provided strong evidence in favor of masturbation. Con misspelled words several times and went completely off topic with their last argument.
Vote Placed by Varrack 1 year ago
Varrack
WyltedCommunistDogTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made arguments in round 2 which Con dropped. Con resorted to attacking the fact that one of the words was spelled wrong, but Pro already clarified this issue in Round 1. Con basically attacked the wording of the resolution without even arguing for the Con side.