The Instigator
Logical-Master
Pro (for)
Winning
148 Points
The Contender
solo
Con (against)
Losing
135 Points

My opponent will win receive the most votes.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/29/2008 Category: Arts
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 5,628 times Debate No: 2289
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (9)
Votes (68)

 

Logical-Master

Pro

My opponent will win since, tehrefore he will. Here, I have committed the fallacy of begging the question. Surely you would not vote for me because of this. I have also presented no evidence to prove that my opponent will win, so you have to vote for him/her. I havee also not bothered to spell check or check for grammatical errors in this post. In short, I am being nonsensical.
solo

Con

I disagree with my opponent, as at the completion of this debate, we will be tied. By not indicating a time frame for a voting period, I can only assume that my opponent means for this outcome to be a constant. If you view some of the other debates on this site, you will see that only a fraction of the voters have voted on some debates, so though "some" may vote for me, "most" (by my definition being an overwhelming majority of the voters that are registered as members for this site) will not vote on this debate one way or the other.
Debate Round No. 1
Logical-Master

Pro

My opponent's asssssssumption is corrects as I do mean to imply for this outcome to be constant. In other words, I am saying that I won't CONSTANTLY have more votes than he does. My opponent says that most (by definition) won't vote for him, but his argument is rather misleading. In the context the resolution, it is clearly suggest that "most" refers to the ones who are interested enough in this debate to vote. Any membersssssss who hasn't viewed this page is irrelevant since they will be unable to be the cause of my opponent receiving more votes. My opponent is also wrong because of this web page: http://www.samruby.com... And noticeeeeeeee how I have yet again faaaailed to check for spelling/grammar. This is extremely disrespectful of me. My opponent will surely win receive the most votes.
solo

Con

<>

Regardless of the votes, I have just won the debate, as he is agreeing that the "constant" condition plays a role in the outcome of this debate.

<>

By saying this, my opponent is also saying that I will CONSTANTLY have more votes than he does, which simply is not true because at the end of this debate we will be tied AND I will cast the first vote for "Con", thus making him completely wrong.

<>

Untrue. My point is as misleading as saying that most Americans are obese. You do not exclude any citizens of the USA with this assessment. You include all of the "members" of the country. Therefore I cannot "receive the most votes", as it is doubtful that this debate will receive enough voters to fulfill the indicated meaning of "most". Then there is the matter in which the majority of the members of Debate.org do not gravitate towards debates of such a frivalous matter -- they prefer to deliberate on debates with substance.

<>

Those members could just as easily vote "Pro", which makes them very relevant. That is like saying that an American's vote in U.S. Politics is irrelevant, which simply is not true.

<http://www.samruby.com...;

Actually, Spider-Man and I are good friends and he agrees with me: Superman can easily defeat Darth Vader any day of the week. HA!

<>

As I know you to be an excellent debater, I don't feel that your spelling should be factored into the voting decision, as I can quite easily discern what your meaning.

Interesting debate, L-M! Thank you! I look forward to the outcome, as even I cannot guess how the voters will respond.
Debate Round No. 2
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by Impact94 3 years ago
Impact94
I read this debate - now my head hurts O.o
Posted by sweatycreases 9 years ago
sweatycreases
THIS TOPIC IS PARTICULARLY FUNNY DUE TO THE FACT THAT LOGICAL MASTER / KLEPTIN HAS AN ADVANTAGE BECAUSE HE HAS MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS AND VOTES FOR HIMSELF AT LEAST TWICE ON EVERY DEBATE. I'M KIND OF SURPRISED THAT HE DIDN'T DEBATE HIMSELF AGAIN ON THIS ONE.
Posted by dundar101 9 years ago
dundar101
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
What the heck?
Nice topic LOL
Posted by Defenestrator 9 years ago
Defenestrator
wow, I've always wanted to do a funny debate but I can't compete with that, I'll table my idea for a later time.

btw, LOL...that is all
Posted by mattresses 9 years ago
mattresses
that's trippin my brain out man...
Posted by Yraelz 9 years ago
Yraelz
I guess this means I must vote for whoever is losing.... Thus I vote for Solo, but should the tides change I suppose I will be changing my vote. =)
Posted by solo 9 years ago
solo
This debate is funny! I like the "screwiness" of it.
Posted by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
That was me who just voted for you, solo! :D
Posted by Yraelz 9 years ago
Yraelz
Awesome! I'm excited! Wonder who will win...
68 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by NiamC 3 years ago
NiamC
Logical-MastersoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
Logical-MastersoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: pro was funnier and convinced us that he won't win this debate....BUT WAIT HE IS WINNING....Mind blown...
Vote Placed by PatriotPerson 4 years ago
PatriotPerson
Logical-MastersoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: I like changing things.
Vote Placed by utahjoker 4 years ago
utahjoker
Logical-MastersoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Vote Placed by ClassicRobert 4 years ago
ClassicRobert
Logical-MastersoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Vote Placed by amey 4 years ago
amey
Logical-MastersoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:21 
Reasons for voting decision: lol pro.
Vote Placed by PeacefulChaos 5 years ago
PeacefulChaos
Logical-MastersoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Well, Pro was losing when I voted ... so yeah =P
Vote Placed by awesomeness 5 years ago
awesomeness
Logical-MastersoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by renji_abarai 5 years ago
renji_abarai
Logical-MastersoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was losing when this happened so I cant hold back a V-bomb can I?
Vote Placed by Ricky_Zahnd 5 years ago
Ricky_Zahnd
Logical-MastersoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: amusing