The Instigator
francescllorens
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
Ragnar_Rahl
Con (against)
Winning
25 Points

NTIC en educación secundaria

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/12/2008 Category: Education
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,483 times Debate No: 3602
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (9)

 

francescllorens

Pro

1. Mejorar la colaboraci�n
2. Aprovechar las capacidades "tecnol�gicas" de los alumnos.
3. Mantener a los profesores actualizados
4. Integrar nuevas competencias en el curr�culo
Ragnar_Rahl

Con

Ya son muchos technolog�as en educac�on secundaria. Muchos distritos de escuela son muy endeudado. Y los nuevas technologias no son especificado. No es una buena idea a pagar dinero por un idea que no es especificado, especialmente si muchos escuelas son financiado por impuestos, porque impuestos son latrocinios.

There are already many technologies in secondary education, and many school districts are in debt. The "new technologies" are not specific, and it is not a good idea to pay many for something that is not specific, especially if many of the schools in question are funded by taxes, because taxes are theft.
Debate Round No. 1
francescllorens

Pro

francescllorens forfeited this round.
Ragnar_Rahl

Con

No es un buena idea a hace un discus�on cuando no tenga argumentos.

It is not a good idea to start a debate when you do not have arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
francescllorens

Pro

francescllorens forfeited this round.
Ragnar_Rahl

Con

Tu perd�das, tu pierdas.

You forfeit, you lose.

Necesito 100 letras por eso?

I need 100 characters for this?
Debate Round No. 3
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Logical-Master 8 years ago
Logical-Master
I'm just now taking spanish and I have a question.

You say: "No es un buena idea a hace un discusíon cuando no tenga argumentos."

Since you're referring to him in present tense, shouldn't it be tienes or tiene (formal)?
Posted by Paradigm_Lost 9 years ago
Paradigm_Lost
Este debate no va tan bien como yo esperaba, ya que es muy unilateral. Para ser honesto, estoy cada vez molesto con los miembros que sólo dan un argumento y, a continuación, huir de la escena.
Posted by Ragnar_Rahl 9 years ago
Ragnar_Rahl
Actually you aren't, your account has been closed.
Posted by THEmanlyDEBATER2 9 years ago
THEmanlyDEBATER2
I'M GOING TO VOTE CON BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHAT PRO IS SAYING.
Posted by Ragnar_Rahl 9 years ago
Ragnar_Rahl
Edit: on the english part of round one, it should say "it is not a good idea to pay money" instead of "it is not a good idea to pay many ."
Posted by Ragnar_Rahl 9 years ago
Ragnar_Rahl
Nevermind, I've got it- it's a mostly french acronym, the spanish must have borrowed it it appears-Nouvelles Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication, or new information and communication technologies.
Posted by Pluto2493 9 years ago
Pluto2493
I don't know what NTIC is
Posted by XsamacadoX 9 years ago
XsamacadoX
hablo poco espanol. pero no grasias.
Posted by Ragnar_Rahl 9 years ago
Ragnar_Rahl
No son muchos personas en este sitio que habla español (¡Aun mal español como mi español!). Recomiendo que contestas mis preguntas, señor frances.

There are not many people on this site who speak spanish, (even spanish as bad as mine.) I recommend that you answer my question Frances.
Posted by Korezaan 9 years ago
Korezaan
no hablo espanol, senor. no comprende.
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 5 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
francescllorensRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeita
Vote Placed by brian_eggleston 9 years ago
brian_eggleston
francescllorensRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by WeaponE 9 years ago
WeaponE
francescllorensRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by geronimo 9 years ago
geronimo
francescllorensRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by zakkuchan 9 years ago
zakkuchan
francescllorensRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by SportsGuru 9 years ago
SportsGuru
francescllorensRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
francescllorensRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by HadenQuinlan 9 years ago
HadenQuinlan
francescllorensRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Ragnar_Rahl 9 years ago
Ragnar_Rahl
francescllorensRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03