The Instigator
nater
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
MDHarris08
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

National Sovereignty

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/24/2008 Category: Politics
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,649 times Debate No: 3776
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

nater

Pro

Political analyst Richard Perle said: "National sovereignty is an obligation as well as entitlement fo all governments." When isolationism is not valued higly enough, this goal of government will not be achieved. Ntaional sovereignty violation can lead to the infringement of human rights, violation of justice, and direct infringement upon what political analysts claim to be a right of the government. Becuase I believe National Sovereignty will be better upheld if the United States chooses to balue isolaionism as a greater good, I stand resolved: That the U.S.A ought to more highly value isolationism.
MDHarris08

Con

MDHarris08 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 1
nater

Pro

nater forfeited this round.
MDHarris08

Con

MDHarris08 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
nater

Pro

nater forfeited this round.
MDHarris08

Con

MDHarris08 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by DoubleXMinus 9 years ago
DoubleXMinus
I'll take this debate, Nater...
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Bitz 9 years ago
Bitz
naterMDHarris08Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30