The shadows are parallel and he is as bright as day in the shadow of the rocket not to mention that you can see a wire in the back round. The flag flaps on the moon when the moon has no atmosphere. There are no stars in the back round. There was also no blast crater.
I would like to thank con for accepting is debate. In this debate, I will prove that all the common arguments against the moon landing are false or at least a false accusation. The shadow were parallel because there was only one light source, the sun which would be completely understandable since they did not want to waste the resources they had for extra lighting. As for them showing up brightly in the shadow of the landing module, you can see fairly well in shadows, a simple google search will show this. But, NASA did not only just film it and show it, they also made it even more visible when that technology came around. Sorta like the contrast settings on a tv or iPad. The flag movement can easily be explained by Newton's laws. Even if your in a vacuum, the law of inertia still apply, and when the astronaut shakes the flag pole to sink it in, you can see physics at work. Below is a video that I believe is very informative in what happened and the techniques used.
Not the mention that if you look closely at the back rounds most of the ma are the same. And if you look carefully at one of the rocks you can see the letter "c" on it suggesting it was a prop. They have good reason for faking it to people where saying that who ever puts a man on the moon first they would win the cold war and the space race. Also if you seed the video up by x2 it looks like it was on earth.