The Instigator
DTSmember
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points
The Contender
pingwa
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Neil Armstrong landed on the moon

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
DTSmember
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/18/2014 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 803 times Debate No: 49351
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)

 

DTSmember

Pro

I will take pro side for this. This is my first debate so I chose a simple topic. First round will be acceptance.
pingwa

Con

The shadows are parallel and he is as bright as day in the shadow of the rocket not to mention that you can see a wire in the back round. The flag flaps on the moon when the moon has no atmosphere. There are no stars in the back round. There was also no blast crater.
Debate Round No. 1
DTSmember

Pro

I would like to thank con for accepting is debate. In this debate, I will prove that all the common arguments against the moon landing are false or at least a false accusation. The shadow were parallel because there was only one light source, the sun which would be completely understandable since they did not want to waste the resources they had for extra lighting. As for them showing up brightly in the shadow of the landing module, you can see fairly well in shadows, a simple google search will show this. But, NASA did not only just film it and show it, they also made it even more visible when that technology came around. Sorta like the contrast settings on a tv or iPad. The flag movement can easily be explained by Newton's laws. Even if your in a vacuum, the law of inertia still apply, and when the astronaut shakes the flag pole to sink it in, you can see physics at work. Below is a video that I believe is very informative in what happened and the techniques used.

http://video.nationalgeographic.com...
pingwa

Con

Not the mention that if you look closely at the back rounds most of the ma are the same. And if you look carefully at one of the rocks you can see the letter "c" on it suggesting it was a prop. They have good reason for faking it to people where saying that who ever puts a man on the moon first they would win the cold war and the space race. Also if you seed the video up by x2 it looks like it was on earth.
Debate Round No. 2
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Kreakin 2 years ago
Kreakin
The ship landed on the moon. The astronauts were in it :-P
Posted by i_know_all_and_i_will_win 2 years ago
i_know_all_and_i_will_win
Believe to be easy. Change it no one is going to except this debate unless they want to troll you. The whole world knows you are correct.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 2 years ago
Geogeer
DTSmemberpingwaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro refuted con's arguments. Con introduced new arguments in the final round that Pro had no opportunity to respond to. Pro wins.