The Instigator
jdog2016
Pro (for)
Losing
7 Points
The Contender
Rational_Thinker9119
Con (against)
Winning
30 Points

NewMexico doesn't exist.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
Rational_Thinker9119
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/12/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,000 times Debate No: 34675
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (7)

 

jdog2016

Pro

It doesn't.
Rational_Thinker9119

Con

New Mexico does in fact exist. Here is a map of it:




You can even take trips to New Mexico (http://www.newmexico.org...).

Here is a picture of New Mexico:




Conclusion

I have provided geographic and photographic evidence that New Mexico does indeed exist. I also provided a link which leads to a website where one can book a trip there one's self. Since I actually provided evidence, and sources; I urge a vote for arguments and sources in the direction of Con. Thank you.
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
I'm sorry, but please leave geographical existence arguments to their originator.

Besides, Australia is a far hotter topic.
Posted by Eitan_Zohar 3 years ago
Eitan_Zohar
I don't want a free win, I want dignity.
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by jarret 3 years ago
jarret
jdog2016Rational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: well duh
Vote Placed by Guy_D 3 years ago
Guy_D
jdog2016Rational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: I thought Pro was very long winded in his argument.
Vote Placed by wolfman4711 3 years ago
wolfman4711
jdog2016Rational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Countering effimero
Vote Placed by effimero89 3 years ago
effimero89
jdog2016Rational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gave bad sources
Vote Placed by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
jdog2016Rational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Well of course New Mexico exists... thats where I buried that dead hooker
Vote Placed by Magicr 3 years ago
Magicr
jdog2016Rational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to make any arguments beyond a bare assertion. Con, on the other hand, cited evidence negating the resolution, hence the argument and source points being awarded in his favor.
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
jdog2016Rational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: One round debate where Pro provided no arguments. Always always ALWAYS have more than one round. Unlike Australia, the evidence for New Mexico is outstanding.