No Game no Life is better than Sword Art Online
Debate Rounds (3)
Rebuttal: My opponent has stated that the anime No Game no Life is a better anime than SAO (Sword Art Online) in every way. Since my opponent has made such a sweeping statement, the burden of proof is on Hisoka to prove that No Game no Life than Sword Art Online in every way, including having better animation, music, commercial success, and critical success. In order to debunk my opponent's argument, I will have to show one way that SAO is better than No Game No Life.
1) Commercial success:
All these sources show the constintancy of the popularity of Sword Art Online magna, which feeds into the popurality of the Sword Art Online anime. No Game No Life is not even on any of these lists, therefore, Sword Art Online is a bigger commercial success than No Game No Life, thus negating the resolution that No Game No Life is a better version of SAO in every way, since it makes more money and is more famous.
Rebuttal: I am not stating that commercial success is everything, I am stating that Sword Art Online is superior to No Game No Life in terms of commercial success, which negates your statement that "No Game no Life is like a better version of SAO"
Argument: The protagonist of Sword Art Online, Kirito, is the Anime hero archetype. He is a highly attractive flawless person. This ruins the allure of the show because the main character is very stereotypical.
Rebuttal: According to the Sword Art Online Wikia, Kirito may have been highly attractive in the beta stage of SAO, but afterwards he appears more feminie. Kitiro is also not a flawless person. He has many flaws including not being good with words, thus coming across as rude to others, he is sometimes too fierce or aggressive in battle, to the point of losing control of himself. Kirito also loses control to his emotions sometimes. These flaws show that Kitiro is not a flawless person, and thus does not fit the anime hero archetype. http://swordartonline.wikia.com...
Argument: Also Sword Art Online is littered with filler episodes.
Rebuttal: According to fillerguide.com, Sword Art Online is only 20% filler with 80% of the anime being non filler, or 5/25 episodes being filler. This filler count is considered quite low for most animes
Argument:SAO has many evident plot holes
Rebuttal: While SAO does have some plot holes, it is common for anime series to have plot holes, and the plot holes do not have a major interference with the quality of the show.
Argument:But the episodes are still littered with useless side stories.
Rebuttal: This is your personal opinion, others may enjoy these side stories.
In conclusion, my opponent has failed to prove that "No Game No Life is like a better version of SAO in every way", but it also has been negated by both Sword Art Online's commercial success and character success.
Hisoka forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||6|
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.