The Instigator
Aerogant
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
FuzzyCatPotato
Con (against)
Winning
28 Points

No debate is new

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
FuzzyCatPotato
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/4/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 527 times Debate No: 59974
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (5)

 

Aerogant

Pro

Not even this one.

Debate.
FuzzyCatPotato

Con

Thank you, Pro.

---

BOP

Pro has the burden of proof (BOP) in this debate, because they must assert something to be true, while Con doesn't have to assert anything. As such, unless Pro proves the resolution true, Con wins.

Pro has provided no arguments, and hence Con wins.

---

Counter-Argument

New means "just beginning" (1).

It is possible for a debate to begin; hence, at some point all debates were "just beginning".

---

References

(1) google.com/search?q=definition+new
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Aerogant 3 years ago
Aerogant
Another one bites the dust; taking things seriously because they lack everything that a discussion requires. I pity you.
Posted by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
1 round debate. Are you retarded? You've failed to provide any reasons for your conclusion. Your opponent doesn't have to say anything and you've lost. Plus you haven't left yourself a round for rebuttals.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 3 years ago
lannan13
AerogantFuzzyCatPotatoTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con actually made an argument.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
AerogantFuzzyCatPotatoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: pro did nothing
Vote Placed by schachdame 3 years ago
schachdame
AerogantFuzzyCatPotatoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: No arguments, resulting in a complete BOP failure. These debates seem suicidal.
Vote Placed by Domr 3 years ago
Domr
AerogantFuzzyCatPotatoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro has made no arguments objectively, or subjectively towards any sort of topic.
Vote Placed by KhalifV 3 years ago
KhalifV
AerogantFuzzyCatPotatoTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Con refuted pro's points and offered arguments