The Instigator
Creech10
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
FREEDO
Pro (for)
Winning
36 Points

Nuclear Bombs

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/16/2011 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,222 times Debate No: 15992
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (6)

 

Creech10

Con

Nukes kill people ... It gives off radiation and if the wind blows it will travel to the U.S if we nuke somewhere ... Nothing will survive and it will just complete devastation to the whole earth ... BECAUSE OF RADIATION !!!!
FREEDO

Pro

I welcome my opponent to the site. It's a mystery to me why he chose me to do this debate but I'll go along with.

Since Con did not specify, I assume the resolution is something like:
"Nuclear Weapons Should Exist".

As Con and as Instigator, my opponent has the burden to prove that they should not. I have the burden to negate Con's arguments, not necessarily to prove that we should have nuclear weapons.

ARGUMENT

Con has so far made claims but has not substantiated them. I ask him to provide credible evidence and/or logical statements to prove that it is wrong for nuclear weapons to exist.

My opponent's first claim: "nukes kill people".

Prove it.

Also, prove that it is wrong to kill people.

Second claim: "It gives off radiation"

Prove it.

Also, prove that radiation is bad.

Third claim: "If the wind blows it will travel to the U.S if we nuke somwhere"

Prove it.

Fourth claim: "Nothing will survive and it will just complete devastation to the whole earth ... BECAUSE OF RADIATION !!!!"

Prove it.

That is all for now.



Debate Round No. 1
Creech10

Con

Creech10 forfeited this round.
FREEDO

Pro

No way I could have seen that coming.....
Debate Round No. 2
Creech10

Con

Creech10 forfeited this round.
FREEDO

Pro

In conclusion:

It has not been proved that there is anything wrong with nuclear weapons.

Vote Pro.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
Creech10FREEDOTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by bossyburrito 5 years ago
bossyburrito
Creech10FREEDOTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: NUKE THE WORLD!11!!11!!1
Vote Placed by BennyW 6 years ago
BennyW
Creech10FREEDOTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit after first round.
Vote Placed by quarterexchange 6 years ago
quarterexchange
Creech10FREEDOTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: obvious
Vote Placed by socialpinko 6 years ago
socialpinko
Creech10FREEDOTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: con did not uphold the BOP for his arguments. obvious forfeit is obvious.
Vote Placed by BlackVoid 6 years ago
BlackVoid
Creech10FREEDOTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Lol?