Debate Rounds (3)
Personally, I noticed that I was in the minority since my Grandmother lived in our house for a long time. But even then families are much larger where I come from (the Indian Sub-continent). I have about 20 aunts and uncles and 50 cousins. Growing up we did not really need friends because we grew up with such a large structure. It is only in the West where the extended family does not play a strong role. However, the nuclear family was the basis of my family. My mother and father who had an arranged marriage were the sole role-models in my life. And that was all I needed.
In relation to the contrast between my story and your vision of modernized countries I would add that you are right about increased work pressure. But by mentioning both ( a. nuclear family b. work pressure) you have made your question a bit wayward. Can you be more specific? For example, I could turn your premise on its head, and say that it is [i]due[/i] to work pressure that the modern family are split into single-parent homes leading to depression. I would cite the growing gap between divorce rates in my area of the world and advanced nations such as Japan and the US where divorce rates are skyrocketing. So, the answer, in short is no, I do not blame the "nuclear family" but exactly the opposite, ie, its absence, as the culprit. Then again, this might differ upon personal considerations, I think?
In modern times there is increasing depression. But as somebody else has already mentioned this could clearly be a sign of good; [i]Not bad [/i]. Perhaps, as a society we progress and thus, those who were alone before can come out with their mental illness and not be ashamed as before. What you see as a symptom may only be the misconceived "growing pains" which are quite healthy for society at large. Who knows?
But most, if not all, modern studies show that a solid family foundation, along with co-relation of support such as faith and tradition, play a strong role in happiness and well-being. [See link: http://abcnews.go.com... ].
With this, I conclude the opening statements. [i]Touche![/i]
badluckbrian forfeited this round.
I would like to add that I overlooked this particular problem in the first round. Since Brian forfeited the second argument I will just make a short statement addressing therapy. It is a misconception that therapy is the equivalent of talking to your best friend or family. There are two misconceptions here: a) Your therapist does not know you. No matter how many "secrets" you spill he is not trying to be your friend through intimate conversations. The reason for privacy is to protect, and [i]only[/i] to protect the patients right to information. Since the therapist only knows [u]what you telling him[/u], basicallly he cannot really abuse or take advantage of you. b) The second point is related to the above. Since he does not know you why talk to him. Yes you could probably talk to your parents about your emotions. In return, your parents will give you emotional advice. The therapist will ignore your emotions, instead give you the pattern. What is "pattern"; It is the underbelly of your subconscious which we conscious beings do not notice. So know a Psychotherapist is not giving you advice about boyfriends and diets to lose some pounds, No! He is instead looking for hidden patterns and exposing them. The difference is that there is a small picture, that is the individual, and the BIG vision of how we fit into society.
I post this as an argument against BadLuckBrian's overall debate premise that the Nuclear Family unit is responsible for psychological harm towards patients of depression. Thank you for hearing this debate - Faz
badluckbrian forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.