The Instigator
rajun
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
iamtheproatthisjob
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Nuclear family is better than a joint family

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
rajun
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/31/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 26,132 times Debate No: 36184
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

rajun

Pro

Hello everyone, Today I would like to give my views for the topic " A nuclear family is better than a joint family"
As the saying goes,"small family ,happy family" Whenever a decision needs to be taken in a joint family, there is a lot of chaos and argument which leads to a bad environment and negative attitudes. The children growing in such an environment will surely be disturbed and have a negative attitude.But in a nuclear family, the breadwinner when taking a decision, will have to consult fewer people and if he/she wants a little more views, it is possible that he/she will even take the views of the children who in turn will feel proud,happy and also their decision making skill will improve which is not the case in a nuclear family.
In a joint family, the commanding person always remains such and the ones whose points do not count have a personality of timidness while, in a nuclear family,democracy is a more possible instance and the family has a more peaceful environment
iamtheproatthisjob

Con

I think a joint family is better. Every person who knows how living with a big family enlightens your day. It doesn't always make taking decesions tougher. Joint families get to celebrate festivals more grandly.
Debate Round No. 1
rajun

Pro

rajun forfeited this round.
iamtheproatthisjob

Con

iamtheproatthisjob forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by rajun 1 year ago
rajun
I forfeited round 2 cause, no countering was required for the weak arguments of CON. Cheers.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by GOP 1 year ago
GOP
rajuniamtheproatthisjobTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro elaborated more.
Vote Placed by donald.keller 1 year ago
donald.keller
rajuniamtheproatthisjobTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Wut...