The Instigator
heynowuranallstar
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Con (against)
Winning
27 Points

Obama is a muslim

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/6/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 572 times Debate No: 74863
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (6)

 

heynowuranallstar

Pro

Barack Hussein Obama
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

I accept. The burden of proof is on PRO to prove that Barack Obama [http://en.wikipedia.org...], the President of the United States, is a musim.

If he fails to prove that, you vote CON.
Debate Round No. 1
heynowuranallstar

Pro

heynowuranallstar forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
heynowuranallstar

Pro

heynowuranallstar forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
heynowuranallstar

Pro

heynowuranallstar forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
heynowuranallstar

Pro

heynowuranallstar forfeited this round.
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

PRO has failed to meet his burden of proof and has forfeited every round.

Therefore, vote CON.
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by TBR 1 year ago
TBR
Too bad. I was waiting for the... proof?
Posted by walle_ras 1 year ago
walle_ras
Good luck.
Posted by Lee001 1 year ago
Lee001
musim?
Posted by ResponsiblyIrresponsible 1 year ago
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Lol.

I thought the running story was that he was an atheist - which could actually be true, though we haven't much evidence for it. Being a muslim is a totally different story.
Posted by TBR 1 year ago
TBR
Watching, waiting.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
heynowuranallstarResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited the majority of the debate, by forfeiting every round of the debate except the first round itself. Such full forfeits are rarely acceptable conduct in any debate setting and are generally considered misconducted. Nonetheless, Con graciously forwarded all their contentions with each round, thus bouncing the debate back to Pro for equal number of rounds. This gracious conduct must be awarded and forfeiture is penalized. Pro placed on themselves a major level of burden of proof, which they were unable to fulfill as the only argument Pro made was "Barack Hussein Obama", which is merely the full name of the President of the United States. While S&G is tied because neither side made *major* mistakes, I would like to note that Con spelled "Muslim" as "musim", without an "l" and failing to capitalize it. Therefore, arguments and conduct to Con. As always, happy to clarify this RFD.
Vote Placed by gabep 1 year ago
gabep
heynowuranallstarResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF. No arguments were made.
Vote Placed by Jack.Jameswood1 1 year ago
Jack.Jameswood1
heynowuranallstarResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Better argument goes to Con because it was not refuted, plus conduct goes to Con because Pro forfeited.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
heynowuranallstarResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to meet BOP and he forfeited every round.
Vote Placed by TheJuniorVarsityNovice 1 year ago
TheJuniorVarsityNovice
heynowuranallstarResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by AngelofDeath 1 year ago
AngelofDeath
heynowuranallstarResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF and BoP was on Pro