Obama is a muslim
Debate Rounds (1)
Firstly, I'd note that as the instigator Pro has the BoP that he/she has ultimately failed to fulfil in this single round.
In fact, absolutely no evidence for Obama [I.E the current president of the U.S] has been provided.
Simply using his name as an example is not classified as viable proof due to the fact that a name does *not* necessarily dictate to ones religion.
In addition there's many people of African, Asian, and Middle Eastern origin that have similar names that do not identify with the Muslim faith. Another example is that Jews can have the name 'Barak'--discounting the 'C'.
As for ISIS, this claim is again unsupported.
On the basis of their resolution and roumd one statement, the position of Pro is thus negated.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: As Con pointed out, Pro had the burden of proof as the instigator and by being Pro. Also, as Con pointed out, both of Pro's arguments were baseless. Since Con negated all of Pro's arguments, arguments go to Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.