The Instigator
LordBeckett
Pro (for)
Losing
19 Points
The Contender
OberHerr
Con (against)
Winning
45 Points

Ober is a troll

Do you like this debate?NoYes+6
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 12 votes the winner is...
OberHerr
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/22/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,575 times Debate No: 23777
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (8)
Votes (12)

 

LordBeckett

Pro

He keeps calling me ice cream and i am a homo sapien
OberHerr

Con

Contention: OberHerr(me) is a troll.

Troll definition: A troll is a supernatural being in Norse mythology and Scandinavian folklore.[1]

Or

In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[2]

So, in order for Pro to win, he must prove this. However, the only evidence he has given is that I called him ice cream, which he has no evidence or source for, and that he is a homo sapien, which he has also been unable to show.

To contend, I will say that I am not a troll, in Internet terms, and have contributed to this site greatly. My evidence?

I have been responsible for several Mafia games such as Halo Mafia, and Beginner's Games 9.1, 9.2, and soon to be 9.3, 9.4 and Half-Life Mafia(Reverse Morality).[3][4][5][6]

Not to mention I have done several debates.[7]

Pro, on the other hands has done no such such thing, and his only posts are things like "Wat is 16kadams", or "wat is president."

Also, there is no proof whatsoever that I am not a supernatural being from Norse/Scandinavian folklore, so I don't think I have to contend that.

Therefore, I conclude that I am not a troll, and that Pro is(in the Internet terms).

Vote Con.

[1]http://en.wikipedia.org...
[2]http://en.wikipedia.org...
[3]http://www.debate.org...
[4]http://www.debate.org...
[5]http://www.debate.org...
[6]http://www.debate.org...
[7]http://www.debate.org...
Debate Round No. 1
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by jamestheawesomeperson 4 years ago
jamestheawesomeperson
You are a jerk, LordBeckett.
Posted by OberHerr 4 years ago
OberHerr
@DN, while technically thats true, it does dampen the chance of trollhood.
Posted by LordBeckett 4 years ago
LordBeckett
ddo voters are bribers
Posted by LordBeckett 4 years ago
LordBeckett
votebombs idiots
Posted by DetectableNinja 4 years ago
DetectableNinja
Although, Obey, you're correlating contribution to lack of trollhood. Which is a false correlation.
Posted by JaxsonRaine 4 years ago
JaxsonRaine
I vote con, but I can't vote.

+ 4 for Con.
Posted by LordBeckett 4 years ago
LordBeckett
no i win
Posted by OberHerr 4 years ago
OberHerr
Thanks for the free win in advance. I need a raise in my percentage.
12 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by vmpire321 4 years ago
vmpire321
LordBeckettOberHerrTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: #OBER 2012
Vote Placed by YYW 4 years ago
YYW
LordBeckettOberHerrTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Ober may be an idiot, but he doesn't seem to be a troll. Beckett made grotesquely uncompelling arguments. Ober, by contrast, was less awful.
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 4 years ago
1dustpelt
LordBeckettOberHerrTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: mercy points
Vote Placed by daytonanerd 4 years ago
daytonanerd
LordBeckettOberHerrTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Beckett provided essentially no argument, except for 'hurtful' names.
Vote Placed by SuburbiaSurvivor 4 years ago
SuburbiaSurvivor
LordBeckettOberHerrTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: This is my vote plus someone else's vote.
Vote Placed by Zaradi 4 years ago
Zaradi
LordBeckettOberHerrTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: lol....
Vote Placed by TUF 4 years ago
TUF
LordBeckettOberHerrTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: countering bossy
Vote Placed by Contra 4 years ago
Contra
LordBeckettOberHerrTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: It is obvious, but yes Oberherr is a troll.
Vote Placed by XimenBao 4 years ago
XimenBao
LordBeckettOberHerrTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: This is my vote plus 1 point of 16kadams vote that got confused.
Vote Placed by bossyburrito 4 years ago
bossyburrito
LordBeckettOberHerrTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:43 
Reasons for voting decision: OBER IS A TROLL