Ocarina of Time better than Majora's Mask
Debate Rounds (2)
First of all, I am mainly doing this debate so that I may vote on other debates.
Zelda Ocorina of time is better than Majora's Mask.
Pro for Majora's Mask 1:
Majoras mask took what Ocarina had and twisted it into something new and unique, it had an actual evil villain who did not care for the usual "here is my plan, try and stop me hero" that is so common in the zelda games and instead it was up to you how you went about the puzzles and trials.
makyho forfeited this round.
Ocarina of Time was revolutionary, but as the technology was new, Nintendo fell back on old reliable methods to create a masterpiece, but it had it's flaws, one being it's length, for many children of the 90s their attention span was short and their time limited.
Majoras mask took everything that made Ocarina of Time Great and compressed it down while adding a pressure to "just finish this bit" in one session, knowing you only had a certain amount of time, made the game fun
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by MagicAintReal 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited and Con did not, conduct to Con. S&G tied. Pro had no argument, in fact, all Pro said was that they needed the debate in order to be granted voting rights (minimum of 3 completed debates). Con mentioned Majora's Mask's innovative new villain, the integral role of the gamer in choosing one's path to finish, the compression of concepts that were too long in ocarina of time into an ADD-friendly sequel, which satisfies 90's kids attention issues, and the time constraints in majora's mask proved a fun challenge to the otherwise typical zelda puzzles; this successfully rejects the resolution. For these reasons, arguments to Con. Neither side used sources, so no source points.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.