The Instigator
mohammeddurkajihad
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
AspectofBane
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points

On balance, the rise of BRIC has had a positive impact on the United States

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/20/2009 Category: Society
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 562 times Debate No: 7014
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

mohammeddurkajihad

Con

definitions:
rise = the current rise of BRIC
BRIC=Big Rabies-Infected Carnivores
United States - the SS United States, not the United States of America

yes, it's me.
AspectofBane

Pro

Contention 1: Since the SS United States is docked in the United States, the ship therefore extends through the entire country, according USA Today (http://www.usatoday.com...). Thus the rise not only spreads throughout the ship, but ALL OVER AMERICA! Overall, this means you love Jenkem.

Contention 2: Your jenkem obsession leads to more animal abuse, which leads to an uprise from rabies-infected animals. Animal abuse leads to uprising en masse (http://getactive.peta.org...), thus by getting high and abusing these animals, they will take over the SS United States (http://living.peta.org...). By allowing them to take over this national landmark, you and your addiction are not only leading to this destruction, but you're also SUPPORTING TERRORISM BY ANIMALS!

Contention 3: Terrorism is already bad and prevalent(), but by allowing to extend to rabies-infected animals and letting them take over a national land mark, that is not a positive growth. If you continue to say this is a positive growth, you are supporting the NUMBER ONE cause of deaths in the Middle East. So by saying this rise in animal terrorism is a positive good, you are condemning death, violence, and jenkem-obsessed nazi socialist lesbians from Norway!

Before Rabies-Infected animals starts ripping tendons and ligaments with his typical knee-jerk reaction to my letters, he should realize that all of his warnings are paralogistic. I begin with critical semantic clarifications. First, what goes around comes around. That conclusion is not based on some sort of power-hungry, bleeding-heart philosophy or on Rabies-Infected animals-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that finding the best way to enable adversaries to meet each other and establish direct personal bonds that contradict the stereotypes they rely upon to power their snappish perceptions is a challenging problem indeed. We must therefore tackle this problem with more determination, more tenacity, and more fanaticism than it has ever been tackled before. Only then will people realize that if we are powerless to make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of Rabies-Infected animals's pleas, it is because we have allowed Rabies-Infected animals to heat the cauldron of terror until it boils over into our daily lives. There is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Rabies-Infected animals's essays from the first word to the last.

Does Rabies-Infected animals really know anything about the bons mots he claims to support? No, he doesn't. So that there may be no misunderstanding, let me make it clear that we must work together to restore the world back to its original balance. What can you do to help? For starters, you might want to debate the efficacy of Rabies-Infected animals's effete comments. I personally derive great satisfaction in doing that sort of thing because the public is like a giant that Rabies-Infected animals has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Rabies-Infected animals leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to provide an antidote to contemporary manifestations of prissy elitism. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that it has long been obvious to attentive observers that Rabies-Infected animals's fixation with ethically bankrupt fomenters of revolution is uninformed. But did you know that his grunts are stampeding happily and mindlessly toward the precipice of splenetic anarchism? He doesn't want you to know that because some people don't seem to mind that he likes to convince inhumane wimps that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining him. What a phlegmatic-to-the-core world we live in! All in all, I realize that this letter has seemed incredibly bleak. However, expecting the worst from Rabies-Infected animals means we will never be disappointed. If we're wrong and Rabies-Infected animals does not try to cheat on taxes, we'll be relieved. If we're right and he does, we'll be prepared.
Debate Round No. 1
mohammeddurkajihad

Con

mohammeddurkajihad forfeited this round.
AspectofBane

Pro

AspectofBane forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
mohammeddurkajihad

Con

mohammeddurkajihad forfeited this round.
AspectofBane

Pro

AspectofBane forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
mohammeddurkajihadAspectofBaneTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: zombies would be good for that ship (lite vote, but both people dropped out; and pro made me laugh more)