The Instigator
Hardcore.Pwnography
Pro (for)
Losing
12 Points
The Contender
cameronl35
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

One Word Debate

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 8 votes the winner is...
cameronl35
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/30/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,354 times Debate No: 20120
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (16)
Votes (8)

 

Hardcore.Pwnography

Pro

One word debates.

Both sides post a word, and voters decide which word they like more.
Word cannot contain hyphens. For example, post-secondary is two words, not one word.

Round one acceptance only.

Any questions, I'll be glad to answer.
cameronl35

Con



I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
Hardcore.Pwnography

Pro

My Word is:


Arachibutyrophobia

According to dictionary.com it is: a fear of peanut butter sticking to the roof ofone's mouth
http://dictionary.reference.com...



Look at Megan Fox having the same problem!
cameronl35

Con

That's a rather peculiar word.

Here's mine:

Cockalorum

A little man with an unduly high opinion of himself [1]



One historical example would be Napoleon Bonaparte.



Or the world's smallest bodybuilder, Aditya 'Romeo' Dev. [2]

Sources:


1. http://www.thefreedictionary.com...

2. http://www.dailymail.co.uk...
Debate Round No. 2
16 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by cameronl35 4 years ago
cameronl35
Btw a definition is not a sentence..
Posted by cameronl35 4 years ago
cameronl35
it's called contender advantage
Posted by Hardcore.Pwnography 4 years ago
Hardcore.Pwnography
Also, I just realized this earlier, but the second poster has an advantage, as he can see what the first poster's word is before posting his own.
Posted by Hardcore.Pwnography 4 years ago
Hardcore.Pwnography
Don't question others motives!
haha I am admitting to bad grammar, I have never said that I had good grammar. I am only saying that you do not have perfect grammar.
Posted by cameronl35 4 years ago
cameronl35
the ironic thing is you did not have a period either so..
Posted by cameronl35 4 years ago
cameronl35
and Capllock why did you counter?
Posted by cameronl35 4 years ago
cameronl35
lol there is no need for a period in a definition
Posted by Hardcore.Pwnography 4 years ago
Hardcore.Pwnography
@cameronl35 and wallstreetathiest

Con has bad grammar as well. Con missed a period in his definition sentence.
Posted by cameronl35 4 years ago
cameronl35
nice, voting on your arbitrary decision to compensate for your spelling errors...Bullocks!
Posted by 16kadams 4 years ago
16kadams
sounds like me so i'll give him a break
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by EthanHuOnDebateOrg 4 years ago
EthanHuOnDebateOrg
Hardcore.Pwnographycameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: counter for CAPlock. No idea why he voted like that; I don't know why he countered, as he doesnt explain.
Vote Placed by vmpire321 4 years ago
vmpire321
Hardcore.Pwnographycameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Funny word pic
Vote Placed by CAPLlock 4 years ago
CAPLlock
Hardcore.Pwnographycameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: counter
Vote Placed by TheNerd 4 years ago
TheNerd
Hardcore.Pwnographycameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This word is just more fun to pronounce.
Vote Placed by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
Hardcore.Pwnographycameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: pro's name was funnier than the word he chose.... and i value cock humor which was found in the con's word...
Vote Placed by Wallstreetatheist 4 years ago
Wallstreetatheist
Hardcore.Pwnographycameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: I agreed with pro before the debate, because his name is strikingly clever and relevant to debate. I agreed with Con after the debate for reasons that will soon become known. Conduct was cordial for both. Con demonstrated better grammar. Pro used phrases as sentences and used "is:" when the colon alone was sufficient. Con's word had "cock" in it which makes it instantly humorous when used seriously, can be used as an insult, and in my subjective opinion was a better word. Sources were tied
Vote Placed by QT 4 years ago
QT
Hardcore.Pwnographycameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's word was more unique and much stranger.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 4 years ago
16kadams
Hardcore.Pwnographycameronl35Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: lol I liked pros word and pic.