The Instigator
Sniklus
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
birdlandmemories
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

Organic consumption in the U.K.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
birdlandmemories
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/5/2014 Category: Health
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 583 times Debate No: 45242
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

Sniklus

Pro

What is the attitude towards organic foods in the U.K.?
Please take a minute and fill out this survey for a masters thesis. Your answers will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you in advance.

Link for survey:
http://www.survey-xact.dk...
birdlandmemories

Con

Since my opponent did not provide the definition of organic, I will go ahead:

Organic: Affecting the structure of an organism [1]

Ok then, who would want something organic over this:





TACOS!


I mean look at it! It's loaded!




And Chuck Norris approves tacos too!

"But I..."

"No, because eating tacos approved by Chuck Norris makes you a..."



Champion!


Sources:


[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...
Debate Round No. 1
Sniklus

Pro

Sniklus forfeited this round.
birdlandmemories

Con

Very sad.
Debate Round No. 2
Sniklus

Pro

Sniklus forfeited this round.
birdlandmemories

Con

Please vote con.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Kc1999 3 years ago
Kc1999
Birdland the Troll
Posted by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
You should probably be more concerned about selection bias when you put surveys on the internet... only a certain kind of people will respond.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by SPENCERJOYAGE14 3 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
SniklusbirdlandmemoriesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Wow, Chuck Norris approves? I do too.
Vote Placed by Kc1999 3 years ago
Kc1999
SniklusbirdlandmemoriesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Equal Conduct; Pro FF and Con trolled. CA goes to con because he brought up Chuck Norris. RS goes to con as he cited Webstiam-Merriam. Ya.